As for the the definition of `junction:ref=`, I must also point out that I observe the use of `junction:ref=` for entries as well. Clearly, there's something ambiguous about the tag that deserves a critical and productive treatment.

Let me ask in another way, if I add `junction:ref=` to numbered intersections and traffic circles, would you oppose?

So I don't see why would you are eager to remove a harmless tag that obviously means something.

"You can add whatever keys you like, but they are of no use if no other user has the faintest idea what they might mean."
Would a common user not likely to interpret `junction:ref=` as the `ref=` of a `junction:*`? It would be more unexpected if the meaning of "motorway junction" is suddenly imposed. I find it more possible that a user that knows what `highway=motorway_junction` to understand what I'm trying mark for the moment. I myself have no idea what to do when I try add the `ref=` for the signalized intersections and traffic circles with `junction=` - it is only when I change to `traffic_signals:ref=` does this become possible (because the roads themselves carry no `ref=`. Would you consider `junction=` as "new, undocumented, undiscussed"? What "common rules" are there for keys that obviously conflict with each other? Again, I didn't "change meaning" of `junction:ref=` yet (I try not to conflict with it yet as well). As for "how to introduce new ones", would you consider a temporary sub-tag of `highway=motorway_junction` signfiicantly "new"?

This leads to EHC only.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84966552

The restaurant should be in the mall below. This may look misleading, but you don't need to worry too much about it. You can choose "can't answer" in the app to leave a note.

I don't see how using `motorway_junction` as the key, that exists in the value of `highway=motorway_junction` would be a problem either.

I didn't change `junction:ref=`. I add a new tag for the time being to clarify its use locally. It would be misapplied here, as a "junction" can have multiple exits associated with it.

The proposal itself seems self-contradictory on "Why not deprecate motorway_junction?" and "Why name it junction:ref?" as well.

Hi. This is to confirm the tag refers to highway exit in the context of `highway=motorway_junction`. In many jurisdictions around the world, only exits are numbered, not the entire junction. It is meaningless to use `junction:ref=` here. Moreover, I find the use of `junction:ref=` dubious, as its proposal (now at undefined status) focusing on exits conflicts with the more established `junction=`. This definition also impedes its use on ordinary roads with named junctions but with no numbered exits.

This is a restaurant object, and this "name" should be a "description".
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84956811

Wrong `change:lane=` values, and lacking way-based turning restriction.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84938267

Please at least respond to comments before editing. Don't start an edit war.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84937603

Please don't degrade information by changing `crossing=traffic_signals` to `crossing=marked`
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84936747

Please don't delete `crossing=traffic_signals`
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84934483

Please don't remove `highway=give_way`, or change `crossing=uncontrolled` to `crossing=unmarked`
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84923486

Please don't change `crossing=traffic_signals` to `crossing=marked`.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84933252

Do you know what `traffic_calming=table` from iD's "raised crosswalk" preset means? Also, don't make a hook/curve for the end of cycle-path as in node/7491047927 - it should be straight
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84799135

and wrong turning restrictions
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/80746269

Wrong tags
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/80746269