It's not about "private", but that this shouldn't be stored in OSM. In the "Map data" button on the right below layers, you can upload or link to a GeoJSON etc "custom map data" file. This can be downloaded from uMap, while I can't find out how to link to it yet (are either in HTML, or Blob). If you need iD's imagery, you can download the OSC file in the save button (but not uploading it), which can be imported to uMap (ignore how it says `.osm` file only).

4. Can you confirm it's no longer used? What about the graves here?

3. Please don't attach other objects to roads. It doesn't reflect reality, and makes editing more difficult.

2. Please discuss before changing `old_name=` to `name=` , which has been attempted repeatedly. OSM is for what's currently used. Use OHM for these.

1. First of all regardless, do you understand the word "Mostly"? What's the relevance and comparison of this example? It must have to do with consistency of the `superroute=` , where the left side is much longer and hilly. relation/18343170
The right side passes the Prince William Forest Park towards the southern end. It could also be incomplete, or wrongly `=hiking=` on its own.
2. I don't understand where you get directionality is "mostly found" in `=bus` and `=road` either. Different roles still follow a general `main` direction. `excursion` should be short, and a lower status.

As mentioned many times, please don't delete directly. Change them to `disused=yes` etc.

Please don't upload such objects. Use JOSM locally, and save them in files.

1. Can you please improve your comprehension and argument. The sentence is "routes, which may go along roads or trails or combinations of these", referring to (mostly rural) routes along roads and paths. Urban routes are proper ones, eg history trails.

I believe the signs are insufficient. They are simply commonplace wayfinding signs found everywhere else. I don't remember if there are any maps.

Again, the problem is you are mixing different domains together. Urban is not the same as hiking. That's an exception. It's not the intention, and would not work for every urban walking corridor that's "shared common knowledge" to be a `=route` , which would simply be arbitary.

Filled ponds should be changed to `landuse=greenfield`

2. Please don't add `name:en=` when it's only your own romanziation. `*:yue-Latn` has already been used.

Please don't accuse "vandalistic" when this is a suspected act. Don't change `old_name=` to `name=` without discussion.

Please upload your edits in the same area together. Don't update 1 object per changeset. changeset/176728421

@kingkingHK No, it's another attribute. `opening_hours=` is not fully standard for `access=` and `highway=` open=*

2. You confused 397 ("Prison") and 399 ("Correctional Institution")
3. Please use meaningful upload comments

Please don't remove `amenity=` + `name=`

Please don't remove, or delete other `building=`

Please upload your edits in the same area together. Don't update 1 object per changeset.

1. Please don't remove other names. All are valid.
2. `name=` is the commonly used one, not `official_name=`
3. Please don't base your arguement solely from copying other maps. This violates copyright.