OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
174542376

Please don't delete these. The next stage is changing to `abandoned:highway=`

174441634

If you think they are "private", you should remove the `name=` only. The graves still existing physically in reality.

174379640

Ok I'm not sure about soft launch. But the Quay needs to be changed together.

174379640

Please wait until the launch day to create. This is misleading now, and transit maps or applications are actually updated weekly or less frequent.

174336694

A crosswalk doesn't need to be formal. This already has `=unmarked` possibly explaining. It is needed for routing. As long as it's not prohibited (with railings), it can be drawn.

174058729

Please don't add `=barrier` to the intersecting point between roads. The intersecting road doesn't encounter it.

174061395

1. `=permissive` doesn't mean by permission, but permissively allowed. `=private` should be used.
2. Please don't add `horse=` , as that's not signposted, and not useful in HK

174087170

Please don't add `access=no` to such `barrier=` , as they are physically designed, and legally can't be crossed. They are unconnected lines that won't be evaluated.

174066022

Please don't change `=pedestrian` to `=footway` . It's the EVA. You are confusing 2 locations. The crosswalk is already at the north.

174086823

It's not created, but modified. It should be moved back to the original alignment.

173974081

Yes, it does. You should think of a good reason to change it first.
The problem with roundabouts is other arms don't necessarily contribute to it.
Have you considered `=*_link` as well? Eg Tsing Tsuen Rd. And in Tsing Yi by your logic, the `=primary` should extended from Heung Sze Rd across to Fung Shue Wo Rd to Tsing King Rd, as the `=residential` road doesn't contribute to promoting it.
For one particular case you should change Ching Cheung Rd to `=tertiary` instead, with the `=secondary_link` left-turn. This further questions how the one to the east connecting Lai Chi Kok Park `=service` road should have at least one section changed (the other has a u-turn back to westbound to access another `=service` road on the `=secondary_link` ).

174046730

Please don't add `bridge=yes` to the walled section, as they are usually mechanically-stabilized embankments( ie `embankment=yes` ). Only use it above the joints, and empty void below.

174046480

Please don't use `service=emergency_access` for EVA, as it actually means roads only used for emergencies, eg outside fire stations, hospitals, and police stations. `emergency=designated` should be added.

174017073

1. Yet again please don't add `oneway=no` to random roads as this is the default, especially when it has `lanes=4`
2. `traffic_calming=yes` is unclear and not helpful. Only consider this when there are many different devices.

174009890

Again it's not necessary to add `fee=no` to `=drinking_water` as it can be assumed. Only add `=yes` exceptions.

174049586

It's not necessary to add eg `indoor=no` , as this is vast majority, and can be assumed.

174047282

This is invalid. A `=multipolygon` should not include `=multipolygon` , only `way` for the outlines. Please avoid touching these as it's complicated if you aren't familiar.

174046447

1. . Please don't add `leisure=park` to different phases. This causes duplicates. They are not parks on their own. There's only 1 "Park" here. It's already covered. relation/12921008
2. `smoking=no` should not be added, as it's the legal and de facto default. Only exceptions should be added.

173974081

`=roundabout` is treated as one circle. That's the standard.

173974081

1. Ok it's the eastbound that should be adjusted