Please don't draw a new line when there's no physical separation. This should use `bus:lanes=`

6. Baby Care Center is not a `shop=baby_goods`

0. Please use accurate upload comment, not a signature with today's date
1. The `man_made=tower` is already enclosed by the `attraction=` way/795214584
2. Why is a popcorn cart `=cafe` ?
3. Are the deleted points torn down? At least some of the `=tree` doesn't seem to be.
4. Please don't use descriptive labels in `name=` which is proper names only. `description=` is already used.
5. You can add `healthcare=yes` , but don't remove `emergency=healthcare`

1. Canton Rd `=tertiary` is for Tong Mi Rd left-turn to MK Rd
2. Frontage roadways should not use `*_link` (common problem worldwide)

Please don't delete the island, which represents what's under the `=tree`

`=locality` is for unspecified, uninhabited, and non-addressing locations. Ta Kwu Ling is obviously used to refer to the estates commonly.

These are not villages, but rural areas. The actual villages are Au Tau, and Ta Ku Ling San Tsuen.

Another consideration is necessity of addresses as `=suburb`

Don't take wiki literally, as it's not guaranteed to be complete. There's problem with the "urban" and `=town` definition. `=suburb` is still used in rural, which may be considered to be in "township" surrounding a `=town` , eg Sha Tau Kok, Sai Kung, Yuen Long. HK further has some distinguishing between the concept of villages and the area they are in, due to compactness or land, and administration or politics.
But this can be `=quarter` to `=neighbourhood`
It was reported to be reinhabited in recent years. However, that can be `was:place=hamlet` + `=isolated_dwelling` too.

There are clear gaps between some. It should not be an aim to fill it fully in a simplistic method. https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/707104213 way/707104214

The smaller `natural=wood` you deleted may be distinct, and surrounded by other land covers https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/707104216 https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/707104218
Please avoid merging them into a larger one, as this would be reducing the detailedness and precision way/707104219
It's a hint you have to redraw after deleting https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/707104217 way/1450268325

1.1. At least we can consider whether classification should change when it intersects roads of the same, or higher class (ie `=primary` Nathan Rd). But this is considering Argyle St routing, not MK Rd alone.
1.2. Tai Kok Tsui (also currently `=tertiary` )doesn't justify `=primary` at the western end. Tong Mi Rd would be from WKC, or LCKR, which should route via Nathan Rd.
2. This is not the same situation, as Argyle St eastbound doesn't continue from west of Nathan Rd. Starting the `=primary` on Argyle St (Sai Yee St; or Sai Yeung Choi St S), or Sai Yee St (MK Rd intersection) doesn't explain it. Therefore it needs to start at Nathan Rd.

0. Please use accurate upload comment, and don't reuse previous unrelated ones. "Add additional information" is not useful, and wrong here. "based on personal knowledge" would already be covered by `=local_knowledge` , or mostly not necessary to be mentioned.

Please don't directly delete these. There is also eg `obstacle=vegetation` for overgrown. The next is `disused=yes` , then `abandoned:highway=` , while deleting is usually when it has never existed only.

Yes of course, I have seen it. I'm exactly pointing out how it doesn't show a `ref=` for certain.

1. `roundtrip=` should not be used on `=route_master`
2. It's not completed yet

3. Fundamentally, at least the different sections should be signposted, or otherwise officially delimited. It should not be merely different suggested tours on a guidebook. This is too soon to determine.

2. `ref=` needs to be signposted confirmation and routing, and used for wayfinding. Please don't simply based on items of a numbered list.

And please explain what's "disappearing". Eg `trail_visiblity=no` is used when it can't be seen. `obstacle=vegetation` for overgrown.

This is not a `=basic_network`
Please don't use brackets. `name=` is for proper names only, not descriptor labels That's a hint of mistake. It should either be a `superroute` with `route=` inside, or a long `=nwn` concurrent with shorter `=rwn` together.