No problem...couldn't resist it

I get the feeling like we are going to have a lot of these in the next few months

I think you meant the one just down the hill outside the architects node/892736461 there isn't a second postbox is there?

thanks for spotting that the road was too long...I turned it into a private driveway otherwise Amazon won't be able to find you... BTW you might want to add the address to way/867672424

Heh, sorry, didn't notice it was 9 years ago. Similar thoughts here. Defining a property boundary as a relation of walls, fences, driveways, etc. whilst correct, is clumsy...but UK property definitions are clumsy. It may come up for discussion again due to ref:UK:uprn. Thanks for the response.

I'm interested in the use of property_boundary. Should it not be something tangible like a wall or a fence? Or are you intending to upgrade them later? Or do you mean that it's an observable boundary like 2 joined driveways?

A long time ago, I know, but just been reading https://memoirsofametrogirl.com/2018/12/29/sloane-square-tube-station-river-westbourne-kilburn-history/ is this actually a culvert and not an aquaduct?

Ach, sorry, that is just further down. This is a driveway changeset/95949338

Updated in changeset/95948200

It's the footpath/sidewalk

Oh really?! I'd like to see you drive a car up that. It's a footpath.

ha! I claim the extenuating circumstances of it being a cold November dog walk, and me typing into Vespucci with cold, fat fingers whilst said dog pulls on the lead making the phone move. :D

I've marked it as 'removed' on https://osm.mathmos.net/postboxes/progress/BN/BN3/#13/50.8363/-0.1873
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94155880

thanks...but, it was my fault that a relation got created because I was trying to do building-parts in iD and failed. I've since re-edited this to make it a house again.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94461347

thanks...but, it was my fault that a relation got created because I was trying to do building-parts in iD and failed. I've since re-edited this to make it a house again.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94461347

Whilst I accept that having an ex-railway line on the map has value, as it may become the route of a cyclepath/footway/etc. the addition of the ex-sidings is highly questionable. It really does belong on OpenHistoricalMap and not on current OSM.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94502073

Hi James,

I was creating the ref:GB:uprn wiki page and discovered a chain through the taginfo....go to the values, choose one, then find the Overpass Turbo link and it find the OSM object!

Kind regards,
Jez

Are you that the street should have a UPRN? 'p' as in 'property'....USRN, yes.

Thank you

Hi Rachel, does this mean that they are over next to (above?) the Al Campo Lounge on London Road now? If so I will shift this point over to there.
Regards,
Jez