OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
37769414

No duplicates after all... Looks like after the connection drop on upload, duplicate objects were created locally but not on the server... What a big relief ! I'm still going to be on my toes next time...

37761751

After repeatedly uploading due to network failure, I made a big mess of duplicated objects... I'll clean it up - but not tonight... Give me a few days of patience... Sorry !

37767240

After repeatedly uploading due to network failure, I made a big mess of duplicated objects... I'll clean it up - but not tonight... Give me a few days of patience... Sorry !

37767643

After repeatedly uploading due to network failure, I made a big mess of duplicated objects... I'll clean it up - but not tonight... Give me a few days of patience... Sorry !

37769414

After repeatedly uploading due to network failure, I made a big mess of duplicated objects... I'll clean it up - but not tonight... Give me a few days of patience... Sorry !

37676586

Bonjour, merci pour cette contribution. J'ai néanmoins quelques commentaires... Pensez à saisir les noms complets et à respecter leur capitalisation - en début de phrase et aux noms propres. Par exemple, "dispensaire de pire" doit être noté "Dispensaire de Pire Gourey". En outre, une mairie est amenity=townhall. J'ai effectué ces quelques corrections dans changeset/37683131

37683131

Corrections effectuées dans changeset/37683131

37676768

En outre, une partie des bâtiments sont tracés sur le toit du bâtiment et non sur la base comme il est expliqué à https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-sn/2016-February/000436.html - votre tracé est donc décalé par rapport à la réalité.

37676768

Bonjour, merci pour cette contribution. J'ai néanmoins quelques commentaires...
"highway=pedestrian" signifie littérallement "rue piétonne" et il est donc inutile de préciser "rue piétonne", surtout dans le name=* qui doit contenir un nom et non une description. Erreur corrigée à changeset/37682753

37433399

Commentaire de test pour la formation

37228023

Split done: changeset/37256532 & changeset/37256093 - still a lot more details to add.

37228023

Cf. http://www.portdakar.sn/images/stories/design/plangeneral.pdf pour le nom des môles du Port Autonome.

37228023

I'm certainly going to split this one with a landuse=harbour area for the Port Autonome de Dakar.

33293663

Yes, I don't understand how this way could in any imaginable way have been sourced from Microsoft Bing since it is not visible on Microsoft Bing. If I am wrong, please do enlighten me !

33293663

Yes, I don't understand how this way could in any imaginable have been sourced from Microsoft Bing since it is nos visible on Microsoft Bing. If I am wrong, please do enlighten me !

33893544

You're welcome ! For further reference, you'll find the Highway Tag Africa documentation here: osm.wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa

33948028

Maaan - such humongous commits and you use Potlatch ? You must be some sort of Potlatch efficiency freak... I cringe at even small edits in a Web browser ! I see you did nine edits with JOSM - you didn't like it ? If you adopt JOSM we'll finish mapping the whole of Senegal in two months !

33935314

Cleaned up by changeset/33940041 - no one noticed... Pfiouh !

33935314

Catastrophe... The upload failed, I retried and I massively created duplicate nodes. I'll clean that up tomorrow... Sorry for the disturbance.

33893544

Hello, thanks for those new ways ! I notice that you chose to model them as highway=track, a tag which according to the Highway Tag Africa convention should be used for ways whose usage is mainly agricultural - a very common mistake for foreign Openstreetmap contributors in Africa. Ways connecting inhabited locations should be highway=unclassified, especially if they are used by vehicles - or highway=residential within a residential area. To convey the physical nature of those ways, you may combine them with tracktype=* and surface=* but their topological role and their usage makes the highway=track unsuitable.