Jarek 🚲's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 60152750 | I have more-or-less validated this changeset and merged or relocated nodes as needed in changeset/66820068 |
|
| 66817895 | Oh yeah - see changeset/60763259 for most extensive past discussion and reasoning |
|
| 60615008 | except I missed node/5754257021/history, sorry about that |
|
| 60576966 | This changeset has been partially reverted in changeset/66817895 as discussed in changeset/60763259 |
|
| 60615008 | This changeset has been partially reverted in changeset/66817895 as discussed in changeset/60763259 |
|
| 60801226 | This changeset has been partially reverted in changeset changeset/66817895 as discussed in changeset/60763259 |
|
| 60985621 | This changeset has been partially reverted in changeset changeset/66817895 as discussed in changeset/60763259 |
|
| 66817895 | I tried to verify conflicts to avoid removing other peoples' fixes, and spared a few points that were actually in correct places in Toronto. Sorry if I got anything wrong. |
|
| 60081965 | dragged the stores that were in the middle of the road to their hopefully-more-or-less-correct locations in changeset/66817293 |
|
| 66777094 | This is meant to avoid having right turns incorrectly show up as "sharp right" - the right from QQW westbound onto Bathurst was previously particularly bad for this. QQW to the west of the intersection is not split to keep street names correct and always set, particularly for the left turn from QQW westbound to Eireann Quay. I realize that this draws left-turning cars from either direction of QQW as being to the right of cars making the oncoming left turn, while in reality they pass to the left. However this already happens in OSM on many (most?) bigger junctions where both intersection roads are split. See also note/1634374 for my surveying and more of my reasoning. |
|
| 58631216 | Hey, is that gap in the sidewalk on Transway Crescent right in front of Kennedy station intended, or a bug? |
|
| 66444508 | I haven't looked into the edits, but IMO naming an account "osm_validation_and_improvements" without identifying an experienced OSM user on whose behalf those edits are made is borderline bannable offence in itself - the name implies authority which is not backed up. |
|
| 66608546 | Oh yeah: source for hgv=no on Springhurst is survey 2019-01-03 |
|
| 66607147 | First time working with this, sorry if something went wrong. I'll monitor this to check for problems. |
|
| 66364581 | Hi, thanks for importing this. But how come bottled/filtered water stores node/6171973666/history and node/6171973667/history got turned from shop=water to shop=hardware? |
|
| 44869224 | Thanks, I corrected 463454976, 32255106, and 32255093 in changeset/66426868 |
|
| 44869224 | Hello, Well, this is where local knowledge and/or common sense is handy, rather than always following a source - official or not. 32255093 is a lane that is south of Saint Clair Avenue and east of Saint Clarens Avenue. But our name for it is currently "Lane South Saint Clair East Clarens" - missing the second Saint. If that's what Geobase says, Geobase is inconsistent with itself. 32255106 is a lane south of way/23145436, which has been renamed from "Mackay Avenue" to "MacKay Avenue" by a local mapper in changeset/5974834. We would therefore presume that "MacKay" is the correct capitalization as signed locally, and the lane name should match it. I did not include 463454975 in my list. I did include the nearby lane 463454976 which misspells name of nearby Westmount Avenue as "Wesmount". Thanks
|
|
| 44869224 | way/32255093
|
|
| 44869224 | way/8111595
consistency between way/7913146 and way/7913158 would also be great |
|
| 44869224 | Hello, could you please have a look at these: way/463454976
|