Jarek 🚲's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 100213668 | Hi PR Historic, I saw that you changed the admin_level on a number of Metro Vancouver municipalities from 8 to 6, as seen here for City of Langley. Did you have particular reasons for making these changes? I'm not sure if you were aware: the documentation on OSM wiki in osm.wiki/Canada_admin_level says that level 6 in BC is supposed to be used for regional districts, and level 8 for incorporated municipalities. Do you think that should not be the case? |
|
| 68956465 | Hello Timothy, This edit renamed "Walmart Supercentre" to "Walmart Supercenter". In this area of the world these are named "Supercentre". |
|
| 96500215 | I undeleted it in changeset/99842964 👍 |
|
| 96500215 | Hello, Thanks again for the solid work you've been doing in the area! I did notice that in this changeset you delete the bike path along Lake Shore Blvd in Coronation Park way/525719049/history#map=18/43.63528/-79.40612 I'm guessing that was a mistake? I see it's not on Esri Clarity imagery, but check imagery like Bing, Esri (non-Clarity), or Maxar. |
|
| 99050835 | not really complete but it's a start |
|
| 98736006 | see also discussion in note/2494458 |
|
| 96439441 | Per changeset/86090482 the pedestrian connection from Bathurst has been removed, but it was readded in this changeset. Which is correct? |
|
| 98473083 | lol iD just cuts off the changeset comment, nice. it was supposed to be something like "but it's mainly for people" |
|
| 97653632 | FYI bounds of this neighbourhood are already mapped way/677481104 so I deleted the node |
|
| 96821018 | for future reference, see related discussion in note/2474913 |
|
| 94657572 | Hello, Wondering what criteria you used in making streets like Yorkville, Charles, St. Joseph, Grosvenor, Elizabeth, or Elm tertiary? Cheers
|
|
| 71705066 | This edit has been reverted in changeset/96628933, see that changeset for details |
|
| 72106715 | This edit has been reverted in changeset/96628933, see that changeset for details |
|
| 71704807 | This edit has been reverted in changeset/96628933, see that changeset for details |
|
| 96628933 | See http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=3193667 and changeset/76279772 for past examples |
|
| 96467159 | Thanks for the updates here, it looks great! |
|
| 96405206 | Hello, With this change removing the left-turn slip roads, access from eastbound TCH to the road leading to Avoca Road (way/184961615/ ) is no longer possible because there's no link between the 2 carriageways of TCH. Is this accurate? |
|
| 93762533 | iD doesn't ask - sorry - but source is survey today |
|
| 92809294 | Cheers! A lot of the other changes are fair enough, and I do think there was too many roads tagged as secondary downtown. Just to let you know I'm thinking of putting together a more-or-less formal proposal to actually have some of the roads as primary, including Richmond, Adelaide, Lake Shore, and probably Jarvis. I will link you if I ever do complete and post it, to get your opinion on that. --Jarek |
|
| 92809294 | Hello, What is your logic for downgrading Richmond and Adelaide? These are the main car routes through downtown. Much of the stretch of King you've upgraded prohibits through traffic, too - that doesn't really square with being the top category in downtown. Thanks,
|