OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
164090471

All footprints here are valid and most are accurate. Remember to use the q key to square footprints when appropriate and use the other editing shortcuts to make mapping accurately easier. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164090471

163528981

All footprints you mapped here are valid, accurate and appropriately squared/circularised. Thank you for your contribution; please continue mapping. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163528981

164089441

The footprints you mapped here are generally valid and accurate but should be squared (q). Thank you for your attention to detail.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164089441

159717484

Only feature which have a name should have a name tag: add hashtags to your changesets to track your contributions instead. I removed the name tags from these buildings. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159717484

159716980

This footprint is valid but inaccurate. Remember to square footprints when appropriate (q).
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159716980

159716946

These footprints are invalid because they outline barriers: footprints should represent individual buildings. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159716946

164089689

Adding a layer tag is not usually the appropriate way to resolve overlap issues. In this case the highway should have been moved out of the way of the buildings in the imagery. Reference the mapping guide of the project. Issues are just automated flags; decide the best course of action when you see them. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164089689

164177322

Looks like you identified buildings in the imagery here but the footprints are not very accurate if you place too many nodes like with the building to the south you can delete them with delete or backspace, if you don't make enough you can add them by by dragging from between two other points.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164177322

161254211

The footprints here are valid, accurate and appropriately squared. Please continue mapping. Thank you for your high quality contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161254211

161254234

The northern most footprint here is L shaped. I mapped it in Changeset: 164573018. Zooming out tends to give more accurate shape and orientation information. In this project if highways are in the way you can move them.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161254234

161254123

All footprints here are valid and the vast majority are accurate. Thank you for your high quality conrtributions. I think that the C shaped building is actually a rectange with a ^- roof cross section. The T shaped building I think could be better mapped as two footprints becasue I cannot see the same diagonal joints in the roof like the building to its south. I made some modifications to the footprins in this changeset and uploaded them in Changeset: 164572759 & Changeset: 164572787.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161254123

164180216

Western footprint is not valid. The eastern one is valid and appropriately squared but it's oversized becasue its shadow was outlined and its orientation could be more accurate. Hope this helps. Please continue mapping.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164180216

164090625

All footprints you added here are valid; it's good that you accurately mapped the L shaped building. Remember to square the corners (q), and please continue mapping.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164090625

164261845

OVerall a good contribution. Some of the footprints here are valid and accurate, others could have been more accurately mapped as square footprints but this is difficult to see in ESRI and only obvious when comparing with bing. Please continue mapping.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164261845

164501175

It may be easier for you to search for the changeset in Open Street Map and use the edit drop down at the top of the page to open the area in ID editor.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164501175

164501175

Please see Changeset: 164502845 for my mapping of this selection of buildings. View the task change-sets via task data in top right of the task window. You'll need to log into (authorise) OSMCha then repeat this step the first time you do it, to load the relevant changesets. You should be able to view the buildings by opening the changeset using ID editor (open with). Hope this helps. Thank you for your contributions.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164501175

164501175

You identified buildings visible in imagery all but two cases here so the vast majority of these footprints are valid, but the footprints are not accurate and should be squared (q).
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164501175

164177802

The vast majority of footprints here are valid and accurate. Thank you for your attention to detail and contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164177802

164175173

The northern most footprint outlines a building and its garden. The majority of the buildings here are valid and accurately mapped especially given that you were using the ID editor. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164175173

164179146

Thesse footpritns should be squared. Hold Alt to prevent your cursor from snapping to data. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164179146