OpenStreetMap
Gregory Peony's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 164176067 | These are temporal yurts as outlined in the project building reference guide, and should not be mapped. It not a big deal I deleted them but you don't need to spend the time or effort to map them.
|
|
| 164089344 | The footprints here are valid and appropriately squared, though they are generally oversized. Good attempt on mapping buildings you thought were L shaped; in this case they are simply quadrilateral and the ground beside them makes it appear as though the roof shape is different.
|
|
| 164088954 | This footprint appears to be East of where it should be.
|
|
| 159483919 | You added a name to this residential area. Do you know its name, or was this accidental?
|
|
| 164134691 | Valid and accurate footprints here. Hold alt to prevent your cursor from snapping.
|
|
| 164186113 | I just want to say that even if a task you submitted is invalidated that isn't neccessarily an assessment of the quality of your contributions. Tasks are evaluated for both quality and completeness. One really good indicator of what you're looking at are shadows. Sometimes different imagery sources show shadows being cast in different or even opposite directions, using that fact can help you to better interpret the imagery. I've done some mapping in the NW of this settlement and I'll post an example of my mapping in the project comments section.
|
|
| 159483704 | some of these footprints envelope multiple buildings and are therefore invalid. Footprints should represent individual buildings. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 164091253 | These footprints are generally valid though inaccurate; they should be smaller and squared. The footprint in the SE outlines multiple buidlings 1 footprint per building please: use shadows and colour to determine where one ends and the other begins. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 164178470 | Footprints here are generally valid though are a little oversized.
|
|
| 164179479 | in the SE you accurately mapped footpritns with a more complex shape, well done. For round buildings or those which share the same shape copyying and pasting footprints can actually make things faster and more condidtent, just be sure to only use that technique for features with the same shape.
|
|
| 164090543 | Many of these footprints outline multiple buildings. 1 building per footprint please.
|
|
| 164175260 | I think that WAY: 1372122262 is just a square building at an angle. The imagery makes it appear the way you mapped it when zoomed in very close. Zooming out a little gives you better shape and orientation information; it should supercede what you see when zoomed in very close. Zooming in helps you place nodes accurately.
|
|
| 164175260 | THanks for improving the accuracy of some of the exisitng footprints here. If you can identify which building a footprint is trying to represent, please modify them by disconnecting the shared nodes and dragging them to accurate loactions etc. instead of deleting them and replacing them with new ones.
|
|
| 159460283 | Many of these footprnits share nodes. To prevent this hold alt so that your cursor doesn't snap to map data. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 159460177 | These buildings are valid but not accurate. buildings need to be drawn accurately enough before tagging and squaring or some corners may not be squared. Please see my project comment for a building mapping procedure.
|
|
| 164179706 | Thanks for modifying some of these footprints; it looks like you improved their accuracy.
|
|
| 164092137 | Highways overlap buildings here and share common nodes with them. Prepare your area before mapping. reference my project comment and the mapping guide.
|
|
| 164091848 | Almost all footprints valid and approritely squared, thoguth they could be more accurate. Generally these are a little oversized and sometimes include the buildings shadow in their size.
|
|
| 164180145 | All footprints valid, vast majority accurate.
|
|
| 164180384 | The footpritnts here are valid and accurate. You correctly modified the highway to make room for the footprints you added. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|