OpenStreetMap
Gregory Peony's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 159483959 | Only add name tags to features if they have a name. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 159717971 | You added #ClaimsIMCebu2024 as the name of these buildings and an admin boundary. Please do not add name tags to features unless they have a name. Put hashtags in your changeset comments to track them.
|
|
| 164174405 | These footprints represent buildings visible in imagery but are not accurate. Please reference my project comment for a building mapping procedure.
|
|
| 164094120 | Most of the footprints here represent buildings visible in imagery, but they are not accurate and should be squared. Some footprints outline multiple buildings. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 31143768 | Hi it looks like you've accidentally modified an admin boundary in this changeset. To avoid this you can filter out boundaries via the map features drop down in the map data panel of ID editor, or the filter window of JOSM. I've restored the geometry of the boundary in changeset/164444498. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. |
|
| 159453287 | Hi it looks like you've accidentally modified an admin boundary in this changeset. To avoid this you can filter out boundaries via the map features drop down in the map data panel of ID editor, or the filter window of JOSM. I've restored the geometry of the boundary in changeset/164444498. Do not add name tags to features unless the thing itself has a name. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. |
|
| 159717971 | Hi it looks like you've accidentally modified an admin boundary in this changeset. To avoid this you can filter out boundaries via the map features drop down in the map data panel of ID editor, or the filter window of JOSM. I've restored the geometry of the boundary in changeset/164444498. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. |
|
| 160220411 | Hi it looks like you've accidentally modified an admin boundary in this changeset. To avoid this you can filter out boundaries via the map features drop down in the map data panel of ID editor, or the filter window of JOSM. I've restored the geometry of the boundary in changeset/164444498. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. |
|
| 164091710 | Hi it looks like you've accidentally modified an admin boundary in this changeset. To avoid this you can filter out boundaries via the map features drop down in the map data panel of ID editor, or the filter window of JOSM. I've restored the geometry of the boundary in changeset/164444498. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. |
|
| 164094161 | Hi it looks like you've accidentally modified an admin boundary in this changeset. To avoid this you can filter out boundaries via the map features drop down in the map data panel of ID editor, or the filter window of JOSM. I've restored the geometry of the boundary in changeset/164444498. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. |
|
| 164178536 | Good correction of the highway geometry in the NW to avoid overlaps. Some highways here still overlap buildings visible in imagery. The stratgic use of splitting (x) and moving (m) can help move highways into alignment more quickly.
|
|
| 164178218 | Good overlall a few buildings here could be a bit more accurate in orientation. You get the best orientation informatino when one pixel of the imagery maps to one on your screen which usually occurs when you're zoomed out. At the extremes features bias to the cardinal directions.--- The highway going E/W here goes more south on the Western side. You can see some highway modifications I made in the area in Changeset: 164441615 Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 164178014 | Looks like you accidentally modified a admin boundary here; you can filter them out in ID using (map features) in the map data panel to prevent editing them. If you find buildings which are not square check if their geometries are good if so it may be possible to simply square them, however in this case the geometry should have been improved as overlap errors may not be addressed by squaring alone.
|
|
| 164094815 | Almost all buildings are valid. I recommend that you folow this procedure when mapping footprints. Add points based on the corners of the roof (can be a little smaller than the roof), tag, square (q), rotate (r) and scale (shift++/-).
|
|
| 164094480 | Most footprints here are valid though some outline gardens visible in imagery barriers like walls can trick you into thinking they're buildings becasue they also cast shadows. Buildings under construction tend to have more going on within the extertior walls. the reason that buildings overlap highways here is because the geomerties are not accurate e.g. the footprint is simply too big to allow the highway to pass. The correct way to address this issue is to make the geomerty accurate so that there is enough space for all of the features you can see. Adding a layer=-1 tag would suggest that the building you mapped is underground. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 164094341 | All but a few buildings here are valid though the footprints are inaccurate. The vast majority footprints here should be squared (q). The building I flagged is far too large. You should try to give your best guess as to the footprint of a building even when it is obscured, but this footprint is about twice as big as it should be. Checking bing imagery gives a good indication of an accurate size becasue it isn't obscured. ---Highways should not share nodes with buildings Hold alt in ID to prevent the creation of shared nodes. You can sheck out ID editing shortcuts here osm.wiki/ID/Shortcuts Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 164406721 | I removed the name tags in Changeset: 164427698. Residential areas should not share nodes with building footprints.
|
|
| 164407149 | You joined the nodes of this highway to a building footprint. Hold alt while editing to prevent your cursor from snapping to data. This highway crosses barriers and buildings and should not pass through this settlement. See Changeset: 164427507 for my resolution. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 164407021 | all footprints valid though some are inaccurate. Try to see if the footprint can be made accurate using squaring and circling then the ID editing shortcuts (?) before concluding that the building is based on a less likely shape. The footprint I flagged should be square not round.
|
|
| 164406721 | The residential area should have been modified to prevent overlap with building footprints (outlined in mapping guide). All buildings here are valid though some are not accurate nor appropriately squared. Highways overlap footprints. Features should not be given a name tag unless they have a name; put hashtags in your changeset comment (when saving) instead. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|