OpenStreetMap
Gregory Peony's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 164046579 | Check Changeset: 164135873 to see how I mapped this task.
|
|
| 164046579 | The orientation of the building you modified in the SW could be more accurate. Zoom out to get better shape and orientation information.
|
|
| 164046798 | This footprint could represent a building and you correctly moved a highway to avoid causing an overlap.
|
|
| 163261090 | Overall a good changeset. You improved the geometry of virtually all of the buildings modified here. You appropriately moved higways to prevent building highway overlapps. All buildings you modified and added are valid. Please press ? in ID to check out the editing shortcuts in ID for scaling and nudging feartues. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 163667599 | Please modify footprints if you can tell which building they represent as you did in the north and south of this changeset rather than deleting and redrawing the from scratch like you did in the middle. Disconnect shared nodes with (d) in ID.
|
|
| 164132165 | The northern footprint outlines what appears to be a building under construction so it is valid and you squared it appropriately. It's fairly accurate but could be a little bit smaller. You can scale features by using (shift + +/-) press ? to see ID editors shortcuts. More like this in the future. The southern footprint does not represent a building I deleted it.
|
|
| 164132244 | These footprints do not represent buildings in the imagery the one in the west possibly outlines a yurt which should not be mapped. I recommend searching for tasks by least recently updated to see if you can find one with fewer mapped buildings that you may find easier to identify to get you started. Also in this area use bing as an interpretation aid switch between imageries using (Ctrl.+B). Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 164091832 | You correctly identified that the building to the north is L shaped, well done. Please remember to square (q) your footprints going forward.
|
|
| 164093496 | The building I flagged is in fact L shaped. Please modify residential areas to prevent them from overlapping with footprints.
|
|
| 164093821 | Please check this changeset (164093821) to see how I mapped this settlement https://osmcha.org/changesets/164106748?filters=%7B%22in_bbox%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%225.259705%2C13.321476%2C5.262451%2C13.324149%22%2C%22value%22%3A%225.259705%2C13.321476%2C5.262451%2C13.324149%22%7D%5D%2C%22area_lt%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A2%2C%22value%22%3A2%7D%5D%2C%22date__gte%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%222024-11-18%22%2C%22value%22%3A%222024-11-18%22%7D%5D%2C%22comment%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22%23hotosm-project-18084%20Mapping%20of%20buildings%20in%20Sokoto%2C%20Nigeria%20for%20%23msf%20%23missingmaps%20%23Sokoto24%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22%23hotosm-project-18084%20Mapping%20of%20buildings%20in%20Sokoto%2C%20Nigeria%20for%20%23msf%20%23missingmaps%20%23Sokoto24%22%7D%5D%7D
|
|
| 164093631 | All footprints are valid but not accurate. All of these footprints should have been squared by pressing q after drawing accurately enough and tagging. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 164092219 | The footprint I flagged envelopes multiple buildings. Each footprint should represent one building: use shadows and alternate imagery sources to determine where one ends and the other begins. In this area Bing is useful as an interpretation aid. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 164092165 | You glued the nodes of several buildings together: hold alt to prevent your cursor from snapping to existing data in ID editor. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 164092026 | All footprints save for the NE one are valid, though not accurate. Draw the building well accurately enough, tag it, then square (q) or round (o) it, then resize. Helpful shortcuts can be found when pressing ? in ID editor. --- The residential area overlaps footprints. I recommend modifying features you expect to overlap footprints before mapping them so that it's out of your way and less likely to cause issues. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 164047198 | Check Changeset: 164104392 to see how I would have mapped the footprints. The main points are that you used the right approach to avoid feature overlap by modifying the highway and residential area. Using an existing node like you did is a bonus. Perhaps the highway could have been moved a little less; highway 'lines' should follow the centre of the highway. The L shaped building I flagged is most likely a rectangle, though it's understandable why you mapped it that way. All footprints are valid i.e. they each represent a building visible in imagery.
|
|
| 164048779 | Most buildings valid and accurate. Some are inaccurate and should be squared (q). Highway moved to avoid overalp.
|
|
| 164048965 | Footprints valid and accurate. Highway correctly moved. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 159460205 | These footprints are valid but not accurate. Map buildings well enough, tag them then square (q) them or make them round (o). Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 159483945 | You deleted existing footprints and replaced them with new ones. I this instance I think that was a good choice becasue they were only a day old and had no prior history. The vast majority of footprints are accurate and valid. Use alternate sources to aid your interpretation. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 164049269 | The vast majority of building footprints you digitised are accurate and valid. I flagged some which I don not think fit that description. You could use a suplimentary source such as bing and switch back and forth with (ctrl.+b) and/or zoom in and out to aid your interpretation. You propperly resolved a highway building overlap. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|