I see you tried to improve some of your contributions here, that's good but you deleted an accurate footprint you previously mapped. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159483183

This footprint is valid, accurate, and has been appropriately squared. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159482737

These footprints are inaccurate. Check if simpler geometries like quadrilaterals and circles represent a building well before trying alternative solutions. Mony of te footprints here outline barriers which may also cast shadows; map what you are certain is a building and use that data to inform your interpretation of imagery. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159483730

All footprints are vaild and most are accurate. The residential area could have been a bit smaller, but you modified it appropriately so that it envelopes the buildings in the settlement and avoids overlapping with footprints. This is easy for me to take care of in JOSM. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164175516

I don't know why I was under the impression that you were using JOSM. Those tools aren't available in ID. It's easier to work with existing data in JOSM. In ID editor getting familliar with the editing shortcuts can be useful as they contatin functions not referenced in the Help section. Open the shortcut panel by pressing the ? key.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164186113

It should take a simmilar ammount of time to; one is delete->redraw, the other is (move) redraw->replace. You'll need the utills plugin to do it. Conflation works very well when you need to replace geometry en masse, because you draw geometry on a new data layer meaning that you can temporarily hide the osm data layer allowing you to view the imagery directly. You'll need the conflation plugin to do this, I recommend reading its about pages linked to when installing the plugin and osm.wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Conflation , then opening two new layers in JOSM so that you can freely experiment and play to learn how to use it without worry. It talks about using an external database/source; you'll essencially be creating that footprint database before conflating.

This is a decent changeset. All but two of the footprints you added here are valid and appropriately squared. Generally they could be be more accurate.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164091441

The two large footprints to the north are not valid because the envelope multiple buildings: map one building per footprint.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164093523

Hold alt to prevent your cursor from snapping to existing data.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164094184

Basically all footprints here are valid and accurate. Please use the replace geometry tool (ctrl+shift+g) or conflation plugin to preserve history rather than deleting features and re drawing them. They weren't here for long this time around but keep it in mind in future.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164186113

Overall a good changeset. I flagged footprints you added which envelope more than one building. Use shadows and roof colour to determine when one ends and the next begins. Check Changeset: 164186287 for my partial resolution. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164181096

Hold alt to prevent your cursor from snapping to data. You joined buildings to highways here. Remember to square footprints where appropriate. This counts as an appropriate occasion. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164181405

One building per footprint. The footprint I flagged envelopes multiple buildings with a round footprint. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164175609

The shared nodes should have been disconected first by selecting them then pressing d
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164179960

Looks like you squared some existing buildings here which is a step in the right direction. Generally these footprints are oversized; their corners should be modified first ro reflect their actual shape and then the corners should be squared.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164179960

I resolved the issues. Check the task changesets to see my edits.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164177985

All of the footprints you added here are valid; those which you squared and rounded are accurate. Please modify features witch are likely to overlapp with your mapping like the residential area before you beging adding data. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164177985

Some of the square footprints you mapped in this area represent barriers and not buildings watchout for secondary shadows to identify barriers. I flagged some examples on this.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164174629

Some of the building footprints you added hera envelope multiple buildings. Use shadows to help tell one building from another.

The vast majority of round footprints are valid and accurate. The square footprints in the West are not accurate. The northern one should be round and the other is oversized and envelopes what could be two buildings. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164174041