OpenStreetMap
Gregory Peony's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 168396405 | The buildings here are close enough to be considered one settlement; only one area is required to envelope them. The two smaller areas use the correct tag of landuse=residential but the larger one does not. Populations can be estimated but to get the actual number you'd likely have to conduct a survey or use other sources of information than aerial photos. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 168396225 | Do you know how many people live here? Just becasue a tag can be applied doesn't mean it should.--- this area should not have been added and is incorrectly tagged. It should be yellow when correct. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 168396986 | Do not delete local information like this unless you're sure it should be removed. Unlike most other features which should be deleted if there is evidence of their non-existence. Place names can still be useful even if the settlement they were named after is no longer there.--- Fret not; I restored this element and tagged it as a locality. See my resolution in Changeset: 168421426. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 168397388 | Welcome to OSM! This residential area does not envelope a settlement and is incorrectly tagged. There is no accompanying place POI. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 168397384 | You correctly identified and tagged both the POI and Residential area. If the residential area were more accurate that'd be excellent. I find that adding an extra node on some corners can make the areas easier to draw accurately.
|
|
| 168398423 | An improvement over the previously crude geometry and an appropriate tag change. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 168396369 | Check Changeset: 168411254 to see how I replaced these with the footprints of individual buildings. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 168397498 | You mapped individual buildings as settlements. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 168397751 | These are not hamlets. Though there are buildings at the two sites I flagged, they are likely communication infrastructure so the landuse wouldn't be residential. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 168397838 | Crude geomerty, incorrect tagging, and no place POI. See my project comment. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 168397860 | Don't tag individual buildings as settlements. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 168397761 | You are envelping settlements with areas but they should be tagged as landuse=residential and have a Place=* POI. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 168403390 | See my project comment and reference the project insructions. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 168398004 | Place tag looks correctly mapped but the area should be tagged as landuse=residential. See my project comment. |
|
| 168400974 | Looks like 2 tasks were overlapping in seperate projects here. If you see that something is already mapped then modify the existing data. Thanks for trynig to accurately map the area, but it was tagged incorrectly and should instead be landuse=residential. |
|
| 168397984 | Hi welcome to OSM. You correctly identified a settlement here and I agree that is it can be mapped as a hamlet. There should be a central point tagged as place=hamlet; the area should be tagges as landuse=residential. Take care to ensure that buildings are enveloped by the residential area. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 168396593 | You correctly updated the value of the place POIs here but the residential areas should be tagged as landuse=residential and traced more accurately. The area of the northern settlement is around 2/3 of what you mapped it as: this affects population estimates. Quality over quantity. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 168397517 | You correctly identified this settlement as a village but the POI tagging should have been updated; not the residential areas. I chose to delete one of the residential areas and envelope the settlement with just one. See how I mapped it in Changeset: 168400239. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 168397913 | This is almost correct. You correctly placed a node at the centre of a settlement. I would considet this a hamlet and not a village.
|
|
| 168396313 | The features enveloped by the likely hedge here appear to be trees and not buildings so this is not a settlement. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|