OpenStreetMap
Gregory Peony's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 134259959 | flagged features not squared.
|
|
| 153778653 | It is good that you moved these buildings instead of deleting them. The one in the NE is moved to align to esri imagery but the SW one looks like it was mapped with an offset. The building in the Ne is L shaped and the SW one is T shaped.
|
|
| 137401353 | All buildings are identified and squared correctly, good job. Building footprints do not have correct geometry e.g. WAY: 1182411249, WAY: 1182411250, WAY: 1182411251, WAY: 1182411254, WAY: 1182411255 are either T or L shaped buildings, not simply quadrilaterals.
|
|
| 137399983 | The building footprints are all correctly squared, save one. You may modify a highway that overlaps with a building footprint. when you do so please state so in your change-set comment.
|
|
| 137399667 | The flagged features should be squared. You have correctly identified buildings in the imagery but their shape and orientation is not alwats accurate. Zooming out can actually help you see the shaped and orientation of buildings.
|
|
| 153961009 | All building footprints in this change-set represent buildings in imagery, good job.
|
|
| 153961183 | You correctly identified all buildings in this change-set, well done.
|
|
| 153961009 | Try to stick to your task area and keep uploads logically and spacially consistent. Please square buildings after tagging them in iD editor. Press h or ? for a list of keybinds and shortcuts.
|
|
| 137401971 | The imagery source you provided seems incorrect.
|
|
| 137401971 | Overall, not a bad contribution. All but one building is properly squared and the building shapes are generally correct. WAY: 1182414133 is perhaps two adjacent buildings based on the shadows it may be safer to map it a two and someone on the ground or using different imagery can confirm and modifiy one of the footprints.
|
|
| 153813120 | All footprints in this change-set are not square. please press q to square building footprints once you've tagged them. They are most likely square in reality even if they imagery distorts them somewhat, and it is virtually impossible for you to place the nodes at exact right angles manualy. WAY: 1300683674 should be an L shaped building building like WAY: 1300683675. I think that some others should be L shaped too.
|
|
| 137400779 | If you uploaded this change-set seperately to 134399868, becuase you were unsure if these features are buildings, then very well done. It makes it easier for others viewing changes to the map and increases the likelihood that your change-set will be verified as good helping to identify high quality contributions. I believe that only the northern building footprint is valid in this scenario, the others may be constructions or perhaps small crop fields.
|
|
| 137399868 | All the buildings you added in this change-set are buildings, well done.
|
|
| 137399868 | WAY: 1182405040, WAY: 1182405042, WAY: 1182405043, WAY: 1182405044 are actually L shaped buildings. Zooming out can help you to identify buildings and their geometry. Zooming in allows you map them accurately.
|
|
| 152042899 | I have changed the flags to the features that should not have been created from schratch but rather the overlapping features that were deleted should have been edited to represent that feature.
|
|
| 152042899 | The features I flagged should definitely not have been deleted. Rather their geometry should be modified, like the objects in the geometry changes section of this change-set if you are modifing an existing feature. Only delete features if you have reason to believe that they either, never existed, or no longer exist. Modifying existing objects preserves their history and meta data e.g. in this change-set WAY: 332619184 was originally added back in 2015 but you deleted it, now the footprint you created represents the same feature but was only created in 2024. This meta data can be useful to those tracking how the map changes over time. Click the features in the change-set to see their history.
|
|
| 152850972 | The outer building footprints are too large, the middle one is far more accurate. At least the northern two builddings are square, not circular. Perhaps counterintuatively, zooming out to the imagery's native resolution will usually make some features easier to determine.
|
|
| 152850833 | You correctly identified all, but perhaps one building, just in older imagery. Generally the buildings you added are oversized, though you appear to have circularized them. This oversizing seems to have led to overlapping building footprints which I flagged. The footprints share a node, and it appears that your cursor likely snapped to it while mapping an adjacent building press 'h' or '?' in iD editor to reference the shortcuts and keybinds one will prevent your cursor from snapping to nodes.
|
|
| 152850117 | You used older imagery to add these buildings. The situation has changed drastically since the images you see in bing; entire settlements are present in some imageries but not others. Alternate imageries can be useful, but you should check and be confdent that the features you're adding are present in the most recent imagery. Start by refering to the project instructions when choosing what imagery to reference. If you later find that you have made a mistake try to fix it, or state it in the comments section of tasks; it's helpful for others contributing to the project.
|
|
| 154094710 | Please upload change-sets with valid comments in future. It makes it significantly easier for others who are trying to analyse, verify, and provide feedback regarding the change-sets. e.g. in this change-set you only modifified a highway yet you uploaded the change-set with the dafualt project comment stating that you mapped buildings.
|