OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
142066154

I agree that Marine Drive doesn't go through, but according to county records, it does go part way. See https://psearch.kitsap.gov/psearch/
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142066154

141973528

The parking lot was already mapped. But there are a lot of areas around Mount Baker that haven't been mapped.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141973528

141903596

This was already tagged as a Chevron fuel site.- I reverted this edit.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141903596

141903518

#TIP: Square buildings by selecting the outline, then just type a "q". The outline should also follow the imagery.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141903518

141903273

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

The feature was already mapped as a convenience store. Can you review this edit to fix the tags? Let me know if you need help.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141903273

141896748

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141896748

141896513

This looks more like a leisure=playground. Can you review?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141896513

141896458

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

The trail overlaps with the pond, and connects to the pond in places. Can you redraw the footway so it doesn't connect or overlap with the detention pond? Also, there is an existing footway that looks like it should be connected to your footway.

Not your issue, but is the service road closed to foot traffic?

I'll send you more info on OSM in a message
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141896458

141893984

Here are some tips to help you out mapping in OSM.

We don't use descriptive names, like name=house or name=line. The tags are sufficient. I made the updates.

Also you added a short footway to the ocean and name it a trail. OSM was started in England so we use British terminology for tagging. A footway is what we would call a sidewalk in the US. A path is what we would call a trail. I updated the feature.

Lastly - you removed a driveway. Not sure why. It appears on the latest imagery. I went ahead and added it back. Let me know if it really doesn't exist.

I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141893984

141843694

Did you notice that the entire golf course is already tagged as the Rolling Hills Golf Course? You might want to remove your node or change it to what is in the building.

141770039

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

This is a residential neighborhood. Not a retail location.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141770039

141667235

#TIPS: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"

Also - save and upload your edits before moving to a distant location.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141667235

141658636

#TIP: Add a changeset comment - it will help you and others.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141658636

141663936

Here is a quote from the wiki " Many privately owned roads are freely accessible for the general public without prior permission- in such case access=private would be wrong and it may be access=permissive if the owner can revoke this permission at their own discretion" See access=*

If you want the road to be access=private I'd suggest either adding a no-trespassing sign or a closed gate.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141663936

141663936

I suspect that Agate Beach Lane is privately maintained. That doesn't make it a private road. You can tag the operator= of the road. As it was previously tagged as access=destination seems more appropriate. You can also add the tag noexit=yes to the last node on the way to help discourage people from using the road. However any geospatial router wouldn't use the road to get to the park. Please review this edit.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141663936

141665586

Thanks for fixing this area. Much appreciated.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141665586

141626786

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141626786

141625191

Wow - I review a lot of edits in Washington State. You are the first to add airplane parking spots. Congrats. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141625191

141580756

#TIP: the school name nodes are redundant. The school grounds are already tagged with the names of the schools.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141580756

141572222

#TIP: Is nice to leave a changeset comment. It might help you find one of your contributions later on.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141572222