OpenStreetMap
Glassman's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 141552178 | removed node - wrong address
|
|
| 141540537 | The county shows Southeast 1st street continuing as it was originally mapped. Can you confirm that it ends where you changed it to? Thanks - I'll send you some info on OSM in a message
|
|
| 141532716 | OSM was started in England so we use their tagging scheme. A path is would we would call a trail. A sidewalk is highway=footway. If the footway is alongside of a road, then we add the tag, footway=sidewalk.
|
|
| 141498744 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. I would probably leave the service=driveway off, just make it a highway=service.
|
|
| 141487278 | Some suggestions - save and upload your contributions before moving to a distant location. OSM doesn't use descriptive names. I've removed the names from the couple of buildings you added. Square buildings by just selecting the outline then type a "q" - a simple step to improve the look of the building.
|
|
| 141432657 | Happy to see another city GIS contribute to OSM. Let me know if you ever need help.
|
|
| 141362452 | OSMCha thinks there is a profanity tag. I can't find it. Inquiring minds want to know.
|
|
| 141318643 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. Two issues - according to King County, the road is Northeast 133rd Place. See https://gismaps.kingcounty.gov/iMap/ Also this looks like a city road so there is no need for the access tag the other user added. Can you update the street? Let me know if you need help. And thanks for update.
|
|
| 141297922 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q" - it will look much nicer
|
|
| 141313104 | I'm not sure what you mean when sections of the footway are tagged as layer=-1. A negative layer usually is something underground or below a bridge. Let me know if you need help sorting this out.
|
|
| 141308739 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. I haven't been there, but it looks like this is a trail, which is marked as a path in OSM. Again, it's all because OSM started in England.
|
|
| 141267929 | This is most likely a service road. Unclassified is just a rural residential road. OSM road classifications are based in England where OSM started. I would suggest changing it back to a service road.
|
|
| 141216627 | I removed the private beach way. Washington State law isn't clear on beach ownership. Also the way isn't an appropriate method to tag a beach as private. Removing the footway is appropriate in your first edit. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message
|
|
| 141053866 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 141040902 | It looks like you added Bainbridge Endodontics twice. I removed the one for the building since I suspect it contains multiple businesses. I also removed the hospital tag since this isn't a hospital. Let me know if you don't agree with my changes. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
|
|
| 140970324 | removed node - this is a residential neighborhood.
|
|
| 140970324 | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
|
|
| 140956982 | #TIP: Somethimes it just the aerial imagery is offset. You can adjust the offset background icon layer on the right side of the editor.
|
|
| 140703551 | #TIP: save and upload your edit before moving on to a more distant location.
|
|
| 140656474 | TIP: Use access=no to indicate park is closed or use opening_hours=closed. Which ever seems most appropriate. County GIS records often have park boundaries that can be added to OSM. Let me know if you need help adding them.
|