GinaroZ's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 94143608 | Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edits. I've removed the access=no tag from this path and also added more paths to the Annandale Way relation: relation/1756393 |
|
| 92306168 | If this path is open then you should remove access=no way/224266307 |
|
| 94847066 | Hi, welcome to OSM. I've fixed the edits by removing the housenumber tag from the building - better to use nodes instead.
|
|
| 91703030 | Remember you can check the Mapillary / OpenStreetCam layers in iD - there's imagery which shows it as an Aldi :)
|
|
| 90326433 | The signs are not green along the entire length, e.g. https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/qq4GvZr836qOvFO18BdUAg
The first two have previously been green signs. It is also not legally classified as a trunk road by Transport Scotland. |
|
| 90326433 | The A697 is not a trunk road, please change it back to primary |
|
| 94134131 | Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edits.
|
|
| 92040967 | Thanks, I've added the building way/872041799 |
|
| 94017217 | Basically in this case relations are made up of the paths/roads of the walking route. As you can see from the orange line I've rerouted the WIW to follow the inland route, thanks: relation/1756633#map=13/55.8749/-5.1205 |
|
| 94107804 | Hi, thanks for the edit however the address is already tagged on this node node/4298776976 |
|
| 94017217 | Hi, generally we don't add the name of walking routes to individual paths - instead we use a relation like this: relation/1756633#map=13/55.8858/-5.1258 Does the West Island Way route go inland here rather than following the A886? |
|
| 94000956 | Hi, please can you add a more useful changeset comment than "various changes" in future. We know that you've made various changes, but here for example even "added buildings and waterway" would be better. |
|
| 90525204 | You've split some roads here but these don't look like dual carriageways? |
|
| 93791033 | Hi, please be careful - the new Bing imagery is sometimes out of alignment with the existing OSM data. You might need to add an offset in the editor to match the data, which is based on ESRI clarity or OS OpenData StreetView |
|
| 93699382 | Hi, thanks for the update to this - I've removed the access=no |
|
| 92776541 | You've got the tagging of this the wrong way round - it should be highway=proposed |
|
| 92975388 | You seem to have changed farmland and parking into buildings and water in this area - any particular reason for this? |
|
| 93366783 | Hi, thanks for the edit however I've moved the Loanhead Car Sales name from the building to the area here: way/865947589 |
|
| 93142574 | Did you notice that the buildings and other roads are not aligned to Bing? |
|
| 93234214 | Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit. I've moved the address details from the building to a node at the approx location of the door - hope this matches what's on the ground. Feel free to add more address details to the surrounding houses if you have local knowledge :) |