Hi! Please don't use the tag highway=traffic_calming for a traffic_calming=island. I also don't think that this object should be tagged with addr:*
So, I'd remove all but traffic_calming=island from way way/628519871

Oops, forgot to say that highway=footway is the normal tag for footways, highway=pedestrian is a bit more special, see also highway=pedestrian

Hi! I've noticed this changeset because of the typo highway=pedes used here:
way/641094694
Are all those bridges really pedestrian only? What about horses, bicycles or motor_cycles? If you are not sure I'd suggest to use highway=path instead, also for the small ways leading to the bridge(s).

I would also not use a key like
artefacts.co.za to point to a web link.
I think website is used for this, or maybe just note.

Hi again!
The tag highway=historical is only used here. I'd suggest to use historic=bridge
and maybe remove the bridge=yes tag.

Hi and welcome to OSM!
Please check typo highway=foodway.
way/640883723
I assume you meant footway. I did not change it yet because this area crosses the building
way/314952425
so maybe it should be split or - if it is underground - needs a layer=-1 tag.
Hope this helps?

Hi!
Please use the lifecycle prefixes on the tag key, not on the value. So, way/543950367
should be disused:highway=path instead of highway=disused:path.
See also osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

Hi! You seem to search for a tag to map the area of the highway ? Do you know area:highway?
osm.wiki/Key%3Aarea%3Ahighway

Please post a link to that other wiki entry.
To make that clear: I personally don't prefer to have all the tags repeated on every way, I just think that this is the way how the community does it and therefore it should be done that way.
I am sure that it is possible to add rules to mkgmap styles to handle this, but I found none which does it. I guess only very few data consumers have rules to handle this because you created an exception here.

Hi and welcome to OSM!
You changed a part of 04Н-497 from highway=tertiary to motorway here with oneway=yes. Bing doesn't show a motorway here, so I reverted this.
I've also changed highway=yes to highway=residential on way/496430591
See changeset/64201369
I see that you added a few more residential roads in this area which are not visible in Bing or other sat images. Do they already exist or are they only planned?
If you have local knowledge, please add survey as source to your changeset comments.

Wenn ich das richtig sehe, dann hast Du bisher immer lieber die Gebäude getrennt und ganz dicht zusammengeschoben. Probier bitte mal aus, ob das mit dem neuen Plugin für die besser funktioniert. Dazu Sicherung vom alten machen (umbenennen), dann von https://josm.openstreetmap.de/attachment/ticket/16948/buildings_tools.jar die neue Version nehmen. Feedback auch gerne per mail.

Hi Dave,
I think the discussion shows that you shold re-add the tags to the ways here.

OK, looks better now. Reg. offsets: I don't know. The GPS traces don't look good in this area, so it is hard to say. Maybe something like 10.75; -11.94 ?

Danke, die Küstenlinie scheint wieder heile zu sein. Habe noch ein MP korrigiert, in dem andere MP als Member waren:
changeset/64175412

Habe jetzt gerade noch mal im Wiki
osm.wiki/DE:Key:building#Wie_mappt_man_Geb.C3.A4ude
nachgeschaut: Dort steht fett gedruckt "Verbinde in der Realität aneinandergrenzende Gebäude auch in OSM"

Neh, genau dann wählst Du den noch nicht verbundenen Punkt aus und drückst N - wenn der Punkt nicht sehr dicht an der Ecke des anderen Gebädes ist oder M, wenn die beiden Ecken vereinigt werden sollen. Wenn die Gebäude nicht verbunden sein sollen gibt es tatsächlich ein Problem. Eigentlich sollte es reichen, die verbundene Ecke mit G zu trennen, aber da schlägt dann der gefundene Fehler zu. Ich würde aber immer dazu neigen, anstatt unverbundener Gebäude mit null Abstand verbundene Gebäude zu erzeugen. Insbesondere, wenn es Garage an Wohnhaus ist, wo ja dann meist auch eine Tür von einem zum anderen führt.

Ich sehe da keinen Zusammenhang. Wenn Du willst, dass die Gebäude zusammenkleben, machst Du das eine (am 1. Gebäude-Eck anfangen und dann - falls nötig - M oder N drücken) wenn nicht, das andere (als nicht direkt am 1. Gebäude anfangen und dann evtl. dichter ranschieben)

I found a few more unclosed ways like this around Great Britain, seems you did this quite often. I think those changes should be reverted or fixed.

Hi!
You added place=island to the unclosed way
way/4009661
Did you see the node node/31018220 ?
I think the tag place=island should be removed from the way or you may close the way and transfer the info from the (much older) node.

Hi!
Not sure what you mean with the fixme.
You can add place=islet.
See place=islet
Does that help?