I intended to split this up between Europe and North America, but I accidentally uploaded the edits in both areas at once.

Thank you, RedAuburn.

Don't listen to mcliquid. These guidelines are worthless bureaucracy that are designed to make simple spelling fixes impossible to execute. I doubt more than a handful of people have ever followed them to the letter.

Smaller bboxes also just lead to more complaints, country-sized bboxes aren't any less contentious than global ones. I tried this and people will just complain about the size again and they'll tell you to ask for discussions on their 3 different national communication channels.

Next time it would help to discuss the changes on the Tagging page of the forum first, like I did here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mass-edit-maxstay-tags-with-inconsistent-units/106155
That way, you reach plenty of people who can comment on the plans and you keep the discussion in a central place.

Happy mapping!

Oh wait, this was the area. Well, the traffic sign is already mapped explicitly, and the highway tag was wrong to begin with. I just didn't see what a description tag would add here.

Hi. We have better tags for that, like cyclestreet=yes or bicycle_road=yes, but that is not clear from this tagging. If you know which one, that would be helpful and then we can tag it properly.

Thank you for having a good look at this case.

I think addr:country should not be on boundary relations at all, because boundaries don't have addresses. is_in=* fits better in this context.

Hi Gengix. Are you sure the name "Lol" of node/11144027438 is correct?

The castle isn't a locality; it's a castle. The place in the addressing scheme can probably be better mapped as a separate object, either as a node or with the boundary ending somewhere near the road.

sorry for the big and awkward bbox. I already reverted my accidental deletion of relation/3651152.

Hello. Please write more informative changeset comments, so other mappers can get an idea of what you are editing. Please have a look at osm.wiki/RU:Good_changeset_comments for the relevant guideline.

Please refrain from “disaster tourism” mapping like this. There’s no need for people from other parts of the world to race to be the first to translate their TV news into Gaza mapping.

Hello. I have reverted your changeset: changeset/143013572

Please do not engage in edit wars.

Gedaan: changeset/142457002

Hoi Leo. Op basis van welke bron heb je deze access tags toegevoegd?

Hi. What are these areas supposed to be? They're mapped in a way that doesn't make much sense to me.

Hoi tiptracks. Dankje voor de info. Ik dacht dat ik het met de luchtfoto goed had gezien, maar blijkbaar niet. Als je me niet voor bent zal ik het morgen corrigeren.

Prima :)

Hoi Thiskal. way/72522896 is geen bos, maar een grasveld met bomen erop.

Hello Flayer. Please provide meaningful comments for your changesets to make it easier for other mappers to see what is going on.

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

@pitscheplatsch Ty for the link.

@bender Please consider updating data in France's overseas territories in separate changesets to limit the bbox size.

Hi there. I removed the location from the map in changeset/142102928, because Airbnb locations do not meet the requirement of ground truth. Unlike hotels, hostels etc, airbnb locations are not recognisable as such from the street.

Please do not map airbnb locations on OSM.