Hello Dacosta. Thanks for mapping here
I am reviewing your work and am a bit disappointed about the quality of your mappings. They are inaccurate and mostly not squared.
Please map more accurate and square each building with the q key in iDeditor.
Best regards and keep mapping

Hello
Thanks for mapping.
About your mapping of buildings
Please be more accurate how you map the buildings and square each building in the editor with the Q key.
Please let nodes not connect to nodes of other buildings
Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right hand menu and solve the issues before you upload your work
Best regards and keep mapping

Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
I reviewed your mappings here.
Please square each building you map with the Q key in the editor. you forgot to square 4 buildings here.
Best regards and keep mapping
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84468386

Hello Mregan. Thanks for mapping here. You asked for a review.
In general , Not bad
Please pay more attention to square the buildings you map. Use the Q key to square each building.
you missed quite a lot .
Highways, Please check which tag was used when you connect to other highways. Here another mapper tagged a few paths (further connected to a Unclassified highway) . You mapped and tagged a new piece as Unclassified. That was correct when you take a look to the width and destignation.
Other mappers might be wrong . When the width of the path is >2 2.5 mtr It should be tagged higher.
Naviation systems will not use paths during their route, so the further going highway cannot be selected,
Are you familiar with this doucment?
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SxLkCU3IRecsFV2kYx61VImJLLtQiKw3/view
Anyhow, Best regards and keep mapping
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84494623

Reviewed as per your request. Mappings are fine and accurate. No errors
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84476846

Hello. . Thanks for mapping here
A remark. Please do not include the shadow of a building in your mappings
Best regards and keep mapping

Hello. You asked for a review
A few points.
Please do not connect nodes of buildings to each other or to other features.
Square each building you map with the Q key in IDeditor.
Please do not include the shadow of buildings in your mapping.
Best regards and keep mapping

Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A remark. Buildings can be recognized by the shadow they give. Please do not include the shadow in the mapping.
And. Please square each building you map with the Q key in iD editor.
From the 182 buildings you mapped here are 117 not squared.
Be sure not to connect nodes of buildings to another building or other features.
Best regards and keep mapping

Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A few remarks.
Buildings are to be recognized by the shadow they give. Prove that it is above groundlevel. mostly a building. Do not include the shadow in your mapping as you did here
Best regards and keep mapping

Hello. Your work has been reviewed for quality reasons.
Please pay more attention on accurate mapping and squaring of the buildings you map.
Square each building with the Q key in the editor.
Due to the angle an image is taken it seems like a roof has a kink in the middle. It is not. A normal rectangular building can be mapped with just 4 nodes. Has it an extension, you need 6 nodes.
Best regards and keep mapping
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84201237

Hello. Your work is subject to a random review
You work is rather good. Just pay more attention on buildings you map by yourself. Square each building with the Q key in RapiD.
Have you been through the introduction on Slack?
I cannot find any message from you so I suspect not.
Please take notice of these document if you haven't don that yet
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SxLkCU3IRecsFV2kYx61VImJLLtQiKw3/view

https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/

https://crowd2map.slack.com/files/U4HH3QGJZ/F012R4WR1NX/rapid_guide_rev_2.pdf

Best regards and keep mapping
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84433390

Reviewed your mappings. See comment on Slack.
Please square always your buildings with the
Q key.
Best regards
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84435251

Hello. I reviewed your mapping acc to your request.
Rather good mapped. A remark,
you mapped on this changeset a piece of road as unclassified highway, continued on another changeset as path. just 50 meters, and continues further as unclassified. This is not logic and don't work with navigation systems. A car can select unclassified highways, but not paths. So the route here ends at the path. :-)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84437593

Hello. Reviewed these mappings. Be sure not connecting nodes of a building to a highway. These are errors.
You also tagged a rather thin trace as unclassified highway. Path was a better tag here, but the highway on the left size into the fields did not to be mapped. Did you see the Guidance for road tagging in Tanzania? see page 14 and around what or what not to be mapped. I removed them
Best regards and keep mapping
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84438903

Hi. Reviewed your work. Siwilde commented already.
I just squared the buildings here
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84438933

Reviewed as per your request. Mappings are fine and accurate. No errors
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84439650

Hi. See my comment on Slack
Best regards
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84132226

Hello Mushfique,
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
These are your very first mappings.
I give comment and advise to improve your mappings.

Most buildings are not that accurate! Sometimes buildings can look off-square because of the angle of the imagery or if trees are covering a part of the roof, but do draw them rectangular, the way they would be in reality . Square each building by pressing the Q key while the object is still selected.
Make sure to deal with AI-generated data (pink stripey buildings) as well, i.e. either use (and if necessary tweak it) or remove it - check instructions tab on the project page for details.
You connected buildings to other features like highways . These are errors. Never let a node of a building or road/path connect to other objects.

About highways. The aim is just to map roads which matters.
Roads connecting throug roads with hamlest, dwellings etc. Not roads/paths leading to farmland or wood
Roads needs to be connected to other roads if possible.
Common used tags for highways in rural area are 'unclassified' and 'path' .The tag ' residential' is to be used in more dense urban areas
Check if they can carry 4 wheel cars. When it is just a narrow trace leading to buildings they are mostly paths.
you can measure the witdht of a road:
ctr +shift+M shows measurements
click on the line between the nodes and you get the width.

Did you go through the documents guidance for road tagging and
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SxLkCU3IRecsFV2kYx61VImJLLtQiKw3/view
https://crowd2map.slack.com/files/U4HH3QGJZ/F010ZH13T6H/get_started_crowd2map_rev_4f.pdf

Thanks for all your work, and please keep mapping :)

Hi. Sorry about my comment about the imagery. You did use the right one

Hello Chiara. You requested a review.
First. The project asks to use the Maxar imagery. You used Bing as the changeset shows.
Your mappings are accurate and squared.
Thanks and keep mapping
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84331991