Hi. As validator I check mappings on errors and other faulty items. 1 point triggers me.
You map rather clumsy. Sorry to say,
Not mapping alongside the outlines of buildings. Not squaring an object. Following tree outlines instead of extrapolating a wall of a building. Most buildings are rectangular. Please map them accordingly
Please check and practice the learning sessions of ID.

Thanks anyhow for mapping

Hi gmhk201. I have to disappoint you. your mappings are insecure and (sorry to say it) very clumsy. I contact you with details

Hello, As validator I checked your mappings. Very short. Fine and precise
There was some offset what I corrected. Keep in mind to check the offset first before starting with mapping.
Thank you for mapping in this project
Frans S

Hi, I am a validator and check mappings on quality and errors.
1 important issu is squaring of buildings.
Most of your buildings are not squared.
Why not install the Building plugin? In JOSM are several plugins which helps you to map faster and deliver a better quality. Need more info? take look here
osm.wiki/Humanitarian_OSM_Team/TM_Welcome_Letter
and here
https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/
YouTube has many instruction video's Search for JOSM.
Success.

Please use tag building=yes whenever you maps buildings. See instructions.
don't use the tag building=house
thanks

please tag building=yes instaed of building=house. Read the instructions of the project please

Dag Femke, Ik ben validator en controleren alle mappings. Het valt me op dat je veel gebouwen niet 'squared'. kun je daar meer aandacht aan besteden? (47 van de 60 gebouwen die je gemapt hebt)
Ook opletten dat je geen nodes van gebouwen aan elkaar koppelt of zomaar 1 hoek van een gebouw.
Succes verder met mappen
Frans S

Just a small remark. Please square your buildings with the S key in ID editor
Take also a look here
http://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/tracing-rectangular-buildings/

Geen idee waar je deze boodschap kunt zien

Hello, I am validating this task and want to share my findings.
In general your mapping is ok and squared. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of the buildings. When you cannot zoom in far enough, use Bing (Align this imagery) Bing allows you to zoom in further and thus map more precise. Thanks for mapping

Hello, I am validating this task and want to share my findings. Please read the instructions carefully and act as asked. You mapped nearly 100 of the buildings as building=House and did not square them
I corrected this. Thanks for mapping

Hi KamwamwanyaJames. I am validating task 162 and noticed that you mapped objects, but did not tag them at all. Please tag buildings as building=yes. Or even better, activate the building tool and map buildings by using the B button. I corrected these.

Hi, I looked again and indeed, 1 was certainly woodcut area. I marked 2 others with a fixme note and want your opinion about these. They are not rectangular as a building, but ???

BTW After I validated this task, others mapped areas with wood and grass and introduced lots of errors.

I'm a bit confused. Bing shows buildings on the marked spots in the woods, on ESRI these are covered. Is this area woodcuts?
I've seen other woodcuts, realy empty places with marks of woodcuts, which looks different.

Who is involved in discussions about this project ?
Is there any activity?

who takes part on these discussions and what will be discussed? Frans S

@MagdaKRK
Hello, Thanks for mapping this tile. Did you read the mapping instructions? the only question is to map residential areas and highways. It is good to see other objects mapped but that in not neccesarry. Anyhow, please keep mapping

Hallo Tom, Bedankt dat je geholpen heb met het mappen voor het HOT project 1090.
Zou je wat aandacht willen besteden aan het ´squaren´ van buildings, en paths etc niet door buildings te laten lopen ? Kleine moeite en bespaart de validator extra werk. Frans

hallo. I'm new here, so I have to learn a lot.
one question. I notice that in the area I am editing the mapped some buildings or roads does not exact follow the outlines of the subject. Is this a limitation in accuracy or should I correct these ?
Frans