OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
179108508

Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped.
Please do not connect nodes of buildings to other buildings.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested.
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179108508

178989615

Hi. I tried to revert this changeset >8400 objects. Were already removed by another mapper.
So this is cleared.
Best regards

178989782

Hi. Are you familiar with this command?

osm.wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Reverter

This should undo all mappings uploaded in that changeset

If this don’t work well, you can give a search command for this changset, after that, delete all mappings.
Let me know it you succeeded
Best regards
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178989782

178989782

Hi. I have no time this week, but will react asap.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178989782

178827587

Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Accurate mapped.
Here are a few multi story buildings which need to be mapped over the rooflines and moved to their footprint.
Check this footage please.

https://youtu.be/u31wPYWkm3E?si=lDbvDutpUyZWQXXL

Best regards

178677455

Hello. Thanks for mapping
Something went seriously wrong here..
Did you not notice the warnings (37) in the issue triangle?
You managed, how I don't know, to map the buildings, but moved all of them, resulting in a serious offset.
I corrected them.
Another point. Never tag a road in a rural area as a highway=livingstreet. This tag is only to be used in close to each other build areas. The tag unclassified highway was a better choice. I corrected it.
Best regards

178770183

Hello. Thanks for mapping.
This is an area with a few quarries.
You changed the tag from 'service' highway into 'tertiary' highway.
I disagree with that. It is not a through-going highway connecting villages etc.
I retagged them again to 'service' highways
Best regards

178651824

Hello. Thanks for mapping.
when a road you mapped crosses a waterway, you have to add a tag to describe the crossing. Here you can clearly see multiple bridges. So they have to be mapped/tagged as a bridge

178826151

Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please add a 'ford' tag where paths crossed a waterway
It is not logical when you map paths to a settlement and continue to map this track as highway=residential in a settlement . Just use the same tag.
Best regards

178617118

Thanks for mapping.
A remark. PLease do not connect nodes of highways to other features than roads.
You connected it to the outline of a residential area. Ideditor showed a warning which you ignored.
Best regards

178658220

Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Very detailed mapped. There is no need to map every small path leading to nowhere. Please focus on paths/roads connecting settlements and through going roads.
Best regards

178586901

Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please do not tag waterway as a path.
the waterway here, a stream, can be identified by the fact that many stones are visible as a trace where a stream flows.
Best regards

178582291

Hello. Thanks for mapping
You mapped a few turning paths to dwellings as residential highway.

Residential is used within a village and more. Here, the tracks are not wide enough to be considered a road. A path is a better tag.
Best regards

178668613

Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not cluster buildings. Each building needs to be mapped individually.
Best regards

178657572

Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You overlooked quite many buildings.
Please don't call a task as complete mapped when there are still buildings to be mapped.
There is hardly a shadow that can help to identify if an object is a building. Dark brown or gray/white rectangular objects with a rusted corrugated metal roof, with a light stripe in the middle of the ridge.
Also rectangular white or blue objects showing a ridge can be mapped as well.
Best regards and keep mapping.

p.s. Sometimes it is usefull to toggle between Mapbox and back to Bing for mapping, to see what is what.

178765118

Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Try to focus on through going paths and roads. No need to map paths/tracks just within rice paddies.

178697254

Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please add a "ford" on waterway/road crossings .
Best regards

178762184

Hi. Difficult area to map.
You often end a road/path just within the border of a residential area. Any reason for that ? Now you don't get a network of roads.
I connected them to eachother.
Nearly all highways are unpaved. Can you add the tag surface=unpaved to the unclassified and residential highways by default here?
In the fastdraw plugin I added highway=unclassified surface=unpaved
to it. Then you map by default an unpaved highway,
Best regards

178501731

Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.

Accurately mapped. However, please, square each rectangular building with the Q key while selected.
Best regards

177578919

Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You regularly mapped courtyards as a building. Often you see a fenced yard (cattle yard) where you can see the inside as well as the outside of such an object.
Don't map them as a building
Best regards and keep mapping