Thanks for mapping
I review tasks of (new) mappers to check if they comply to the requirements, are free of errors and of a good mapping quality.
Please pay more attention on correct and precise mapping. sometimes your mapping are inaccurate
Nest regards
Please use the MAXAR P imagery, Most recent

Hello Dee11.
Thanks for mapping
I review tasks of (new) mappers to check if they comply to the requirements, are free of errors and of a good mapping quality.
Your mappings are fair and precise.
Haven't you notice the inaccurate mappings on the same task? They were so inaccurate placed (with the wrong Imagery) that they did not cover the buildings. I removed them and added some missing buildings.
Best regards and keep mapping

Hello Hasnaa13.
Thanks for mapping
I review tasks of (new) mappers to check if they comply to the requirements, are free of errors and of a good mapping quality. I am sorry to say that both inaccurate mapping and using the wrong Imagery makes it necessary to remove your mappings and let them map all over again.
Best regards

Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Just a short remark. Do not include the shadow of a building in your mapping.
Best regards

Hello Antagu. You have noticed that I checked all your mappings. Do not take this as a personal issue to you. The used imagery is every time the Bing imagery. The instructions says to use the Maxar imagery so I had to review all your tasks you marked as complete mapped. The Bing imagery is rather old <2015
Maxar is more recent and shows more buildings since the Bing imagery was used.
Best regards and keep mapping

Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A remark
Do not include the shadow of a building into your mappings. The dark/black spot beneath a building. It indicates whether an object is above ground level or not
Best regards

Hello Mimi. Thanks for mapping
I review tasks of (new) mappers to check if they comply to the requirements and are free of errors. On the attached pictures you see your mappings back.
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1JM-TBDVU07Scmc3sUW1hkN-aIfzs9GzC
This is not the way the mappings should be. Take a look to the surrounding mapped buildings. Each building has to be mapped individual. No trees or empty spaces should be included.
Please square all buildings you map with the Q key in iD editor in future mappings. You can also keep the Q key pressed down and select the buildings each after each other (except the round buildings) You squared none.
Best regards

Hello. I review work of new mappers to check if they comply with the requirements and are free of errors
I enclosed a few pictures which shows from left to right the image, the way you mapped the buildings and the way they should be mapped.
https://drive.google.com/open?id=10qktnUVEZOM3LR9b6OtDONLlnidOVM1Y
Never include trees in a mapping. Extrapolate the roofline.
Do not include the shadow of a building into your mappings. The dark/black spot beneath a building. It indicates whether an object is above ground level or not.

Please square all buildings you map with the Q key in iD editor in future mappings. You can also keep the Q key pressed down and select the buildings each after each other (except the round buildings)

Best regards and keep mapping

Hello Beccam. Good and precise mapping
Just a few remarks.
Do not include the shadow of a building into your mappings. The dark/black spot beneath a building. It indicates whether an object is above ground level or not .
Please square all buildings you map with the Q key in iD editor in future mappings. You can also keep the Q key pressed down and select the buildings each after each other (except the round buildings) I think you draw them as good as possible , But squaring with the Q tool gives best result.
Best regards

Perhaps you're not aware of this possibility to square buildings
You can also keep the Q key pressed down and select the buildings each after each other (except the round buildings)
Also for us it is difficult to know in which period an image is taken.
Best proven method is looking for a building under construction or something like that. Compare that with the other imageries. Often it will be clear which Imagery is best to use. When we recommend an Imagery, it's mostly the most recent.
To make it more difficult. It is known that some photos, used to make an image might be very old, compared with others in the same image. But we have to deal with that. They are donated by the Big operators of imageries
Best regards

Hello Collab.
Thanks for mapping
First of all. Please switch to the MAXAR P Imagery. This is since it became available ( begin july) it is the preferred Imagery, Bing is outdated.
Please square all buildings you map with the Q key in iD editor in future mappings. You can also keep the Q key pressed down and select the buildings each after each other (except the round buildings) You squared none.
Best regards

Hello. I deleted all buildings you have mapped here due to poor quality of mapping. It cost so much time more than map them all over.
Please use the Maxar P imagery to map from. More recent.

Hallo Johan. Bedankt voor het mappen.
Zou je wat meer aandacht willen besteden aan het gedetaileerd mappen? Je mapt je gebouwen dikwels nogal royaal.
Groeten

Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please Use the Maxar P imagery for next mappings here. See instructions.

Hello again. I have seen quite a number of mappings of you but have no idea how you manage it to map so incorrect. Mappings do not correspondence with the objects underneath, misplaced. not squared. Sorry, but on this way you create much more work rather than helping us

Hi Patoche. I was looking to some mappings of you and have some remarks.
On this changeset your mappings are somewhat inaccurate.
Please square all buildings you map with the Q key in iD editor in future mappings. You can also keep the Q key pressed down and select the buildings each after each other (except the round buildings) You missed just a few.
Best regards
Frans S (sr validator)

Hello. Why don't you have access to the MAXAR P imagery. I opened this changeset in IDeditor and MAXAR P is listed as well. There is not such thing that there are different ID editors?
However, The modifications you made are made on BING which is taken between 12/31/2009-3/31/2016
Maxar imagery is more recent. So the mapping you made brings it back to the state of perhaps 10 years ago, I reverted this changeset.
See this pictures. the left one is your mapping shown on the Maxar imagery
The right one is my mapping which you adjusted back to the Bing imagery.https://drive.google.com/open?id=1fgdIX8QBeGhtII08STKrpbVKOqqxSFHY
You did not map any buildings, did you ?
I invalidate this task again.
I noticed that you map also on other projects which ask for MAXAR P imagery. Please check these,
Best regards

Hello Kishen. Thanks for mapping.
This is your very first mapping I see.
Please take the time to improve your mapping skills.
Several beginners faults.
When you see a building,Sometimes there seems to be a kink in the middle of a roofline at the height of the ridge in the roof when it's a gable roof.
This is caused by the angle at which a satellite image was made. You can simply map this as a rectangular (4 nodes) roof

Please square all buildings you map with the Q key in iD editor in future mappings. You can also keep the Q key pressed down and select the buildings each after each other (except the round buildings) You squared none..
A few pointers -
1) Most buildings are square so your mapping should reflect that
2) Please outline the buildings as closely as possible to the actual shape and try not to include the shadows of the buildings. When a building is partly covered by trees, extrapolate the roofline rather than the outlines of a tree.
3) Map each building separately.
Have you local knowledge ?
you mapped , what for me looked as just as a building, as a daycourt.!
Best regards and keep mapping

Hello Kirrily
Thanks for helping on this project.
A question. Why spending time on mapping a few trees i the middle of a jungle? or a piece of bare rock. which appeared to be an open piece of land , overgrown by the jungle as you can see on more recent Imageries.
Please focus on the objects to be mapped on the instructions and use the Maxar P imagery, which is the most recent.

Hello Alex. Validators review work of (beginner) mappers to check if they comply with the requirements and are of a good quality.
Your mappings are very inaccurate. Often much to oversized. not squared. in a number of occasions you map several buildings as being 1 building.
Please improve your mapping skills.

Please square all buildings you map with the Q key in iD editor in future mappings. You can also keep the Q key pressed down and select the buildings each after each other (except the round buildings) You squared none.
Please look to this webpage.
your mappings are shown and the adjustments
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=73078921
Your mappings are in the middle
Best regards