Enock4seth's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 59364800 | Not sure this node/4595319470 has moved here, can you please clarify? |
|
| 111377642 | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, LearnOSM - https://learnosm.org/en/ is a good starting resource. Adding ways without any tagging is like adding nothing. |
|
| 111376405 | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, LearnOSM - https://learnosm.org/en/ is a good starting resource. Adding ways without any tagging is like adding nothing. |
|
| 111379058 | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, LearnOSM - https://learnosm.org/en/ is a good starting resource. Adding ways without any tagging is like adding nothing. |
|
| 111048576 | Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. This way/414615656 is not a farmland :), I have changed to school which seems to be the nearest from my observation and fixme on way/981903320/history LearnOSM is a good resource for getting started https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/ |
|
| 101856602 | Glad to hear you don't map these anymore. Thank you for your comment, this has been fixed now. You might also want to re-visit similar previous contributions and fix them yourself too. |
|
| 76109810 | Hello, I find this and other changesets around have used nodes to map buildings. Could you please convert them to areas where applicable? Good Bing imagery exist. |
|
| 101856602 | In the first place, why are you mapping so called 'small residential roads' that do not even exist? It is not just about me or other mappers making whatever changes / correcting it, but you being aware and stopping these kinds of mapping. Glad you can tell, it's a mess. |
|
| 101856602 | WHAT! This doesn't look good. What is this you have done around here: way/208562207 mapping roads? Can you clarify what you are trying to achieve? |
|
| 107349574 | Could you please clarify the name for this way/961009041 Also, it's overlapping with existing building. Please kindly zoom in to see all existing features before adding new ones to avoid duplicates. |
|
| 97001582 | @Mark Kindly represent only one feature with one element, instead of tagging both building and node as same feature. See osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element Please also avoid using links to commercial / copyrighted images. See image=* |
|
| 103947546 | The ``building" and ``name" values looks confusing here way/937555731 , is this a garage for the school or this is the school itself. Can you kindly clarify or help fix? Thanks |
|
| 109502430 | Sorry, wrong changeset for this comment |
|
| 109502430 | The ``building" and ``name" values looks confusing here way/937555731 , is this a garage for the school or this is the school itself. Can you kindly clarify or help fix? Thanks |
|
| 108373824 | Kindly represent only one feature with one element, instead of tagging all buildings and the entire area as a clinic. See osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element |
|
| 109628603 | I am sure the name of this way/972858092 not "Rice" can you please update or explain what you are trying to say? |
|
| 82581978 | I have a strong feeling Maxar Standard Imagery hasn't the best alignment with existing data but was used to add new/update data, ignoring alignment with other imagery such as Bing. Can you please clarify what happened here? |
|
| 109139690 | Kindly use only one value for "takeway=*" see takeaway=* |
|
| 109412850 | Hello. welcome what are you trying to map? |
|
| 51411959 | Sorry I did not put in the reference, here way/518373603 "Living with the hope of local mappers sorting things" this assumption makes things difficult for local / craft mappers like myself, hence if you can't follow the right geometry it would be better to trace up to a point with the right geometry or leave it completely. Yes, this was a HOT TM project I created which was heavily contributed to mostly by remote volunteers like yourself and corporate mappers from Apple. Revisiting and reviewing remote mappings in Ghana is making a couple of revelations. Thank you. |