I am sorry, this seems false positive and shouldn't be the reason for re-classification as `tertiary`. The way I referenced leads nowhere from node/4698223484 but continues to be classified as `tertiary`.

Furthermore, the main road via the interchange have been completed and opened to traffic recently, but I will wait for public and accessible imagery/references to draw a conclusion on which way is connected, used or not, thanks.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Here are some resources to help you
- https://welcome.openstreetmap.org/
- https://learnosm.org/

Furthermore, only trace footprints of buildings instead of entire compound as a building. I hope this helps

Hi Denison, Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I am curious if the "Drone images" used for reference could be made public via https://openaerialmap.org/. Furthermore, instead of deleting existing objects and trying to redraw them completely, kindly use utils2plugin's "Replace Geometry" function; see https://learnosm.org/en/josm/josm-more-plugins/

Please take note of the Imagery offset with Bing and existing data. Use the osm.wiki/Imagery_Offset_Database plugin to find out about offsets saved by others.

On what basis are you classifying this way/476181926 and other?

Where is this reference imagery used? And wondering how your team decided to connect a residential road to motorway 2 years ago too way/637555403/history?

This is over 4 years, I believe you can fix them now, kindly use "Replace Geometry", See #4 https://learnosm.org/en/josm/josm-more-plugins/ on how it works. And here is an example https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/472108318

Could clarify what you are trying to achieve with these De minimis changesets that seems not add anything useful?

Some roads here needs not to be deleted. Bing looks most recent in this area. Compare other imagery with way/965268331

Please, can you check and update the name to "<Location> Police Station", thank you :)

Please, adjust imagery offset instead of moving existing data, see https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/29474768

Hello Genesis James, welcome to OpenStreetMap and happy you like it here. Thanks for your contributions. The name of the RC church probably is something like "St. Peters ...." not just "Roman Catholic Church". I have made a quick change on which additional tags needs to have been added, see here way/963215989. LearnOSM https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#basic-editing-with-id is a good starting resource

Hello, welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contributions. I have reviewed and make changes. LearnOSM https://learnosm.org is a great resource for getting started to OpenStreetMap

Hello Sylvia, welcome to OpenStreetMap. The name of the building is not "A storey building". The building:levels tag indicates the number of levels the building has, which you rightly entered. LearnOSM https://learnosm.org is a great resource for getting started

Imagery offset ignored. Compare and align with existing data, e.g. way/961500252

Welcome to OpenStreetMap Ewoenam, I have reviewed your contribution. LearnOSM - https://learnosm.org is a good starting resource. Please don't put your name as a hashtag in the changeset comment.

A good changeset comment would be: Added church building #whateverhashtags

This becoming too much, I don't understand why you people have decided not to take into consideration imagery offset and just blindly adding what is of interest to you without respecting existing data. Why?

Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta) might be newer than Bing and other imagery, but take note of offsets. Also, only hashtags in changeset comment is not helpful.

Please don't just remove / change "place=village" to "landuse=residential". Kindly keep it or reuse the "name=*" and "place=*" on a node say node/2850316027#map=18/5.70523/-1.60535

follow best practices and avoid using only hashtags for changeset comments. Describe briefly what you mapped in addition to those hashtags. Read osm.wiki/Good_practice