OpenStreetMap
DmitTrix's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 118742154 | P.S.: I also checked historical satellite imagery on Google Earth. It does look like my memory about some kind of piping infrastructure object is correct. On that imagery:
So, looks like there was something there, but it was dismounted in 2010 (or at the very end of 2009) |
|
| 118742154 | Hi! If I recall correctly, it was a fence around some kind of water infrastructure object (some big pipes with big valves). Or maybe I'm confused, and it was just a leveled patch of ground used for parking. But anyway, it doesn't exist anymore. For reference: the object doesn't exist on GovMap imagery from 2008 (https://www.govmap.gov.il/?c=205557.36,727475.45&z=11&b=1&sb=7). Then it does exist in 2013 (https://www.govmap.gov.il/?c=205557.36,727475.45&z=11&b=1&sb=8) and again is non-existent in 2019 (https://www.govmap.gov.il/?c=205557.36,727475.45&z=11&b=1&sb=6) |
|
| 130615108 | ||
| 130615108 | You mean this one? way/1125471997 If so, no these are separated stones on a grassy surface, like said in the tag description in the wiki: "Commonly used for <…>, or areas to preserve the grass from being trampled" |
|
| 139446686 | Restored the "image" tag here:
No other items returned by your query contained "image" tag before. |
|
| 139446686 | @zstadler,
Is there any way to find all my edits where I deleted "image" tags? If not, I'm afraid I won't be able to find them all manually. |
|
| 139446686 | Regarding other elements: there should be a few (probably less than, say, 20) such elements; the problem is, I don't know how I can find them. The edits were done fairly long ago. ———————— Regarding multiple "wikimedia_commons" keys: wikimedia_commons=* says this: If more images are available, just add the "best" one or create a new Wikimedia Commons gallery Since "best" is subjective (which is actually mentioned as one of the drawbacks of using the "image" key), I'd prefer linking to a category or a gallery. This also covers the case that a "better" image is added there by a Commons user who is unaware of OSM. If there is more than one category that contains suitable images, the best option is probably to create a new category (if appropriate) or a gallery on Commons, and link to it. ———————— Keeping both "image" and "wikimedia_commons" keys: sounds to me like a fair solution for the time being. |
|
| 139446686 | Hi! First, my apologies if my edits broke things… Second, at the very beginning of image=* it says "the proposals for this tag were rejected due to several problems with the tag", and then lists a few issues which are fairly severe, to my opinion. On the other hand, using a pointer to a Commons gallery or category avoids most of these issues. So, I just followed with the approach that looked more correct to me. |
|
| 143600534 | הי! תודה על ההתראה. |
|
| 129401904 | Hi! No, it's not one-way – at least not in legal sense. I removed the tag. |
|
| 141969024 | Hi! I added wikimedia_commons tag which points to a category (that I created) that contains all images of the place I could find on Commons. image=*#Unresolved issues points out a few issues with "image" tag, and I don't even know which software supports "image<something>" tags. So I assumed that with the addition of "wikimedia_commons" it would be better to remove all "image" tags. But I'm not that experienced at OSM; if it would be better to have both, please re-add the image(s) that you prefer. |
|
| 129401904 | (@hatul) Oh, sorry for that, and thanks for fixing! |
|
| 111051421 | Should be fixed now. Sorry, I haven't noticed I have incomplete edits when uploading this changeset. |