Par labojumu way/90279637 - ēku daļu izzīmēšanai ir jālieto building:part (building:part=*), nevis jāzīmē ēkas uz ēkām. Lūgums salabot.

Explain why you changed this to a service road instead of a track given the definitions in wiki (highway=service and highway=track).

Uzņēmumu reģistrā gan ir ar lielajiem burtiem: https://company.lursoft.lv/lv/enhars/40003544196

Corrected to more suitable tags: changeset/154621988

Yes, with Enhars it's a bit complicated as they differ from each other also. This one has a butcher, pastry, ability to order a coffee and a table with a pairs of chairs, if I remember correctly.

They don't sell even a single vegetable/fruit, impossible to be shop=greengrocer.

Ja jau ir iezīmēts highway multipoligons, lūgums tajā nepārspīlēt ar ceļu kā līniju izzīmēšanu. Nepieciešami ir tikai galvenie savienojumi priekš maršrutēšanas. Arīdzan lūgums neatstāt ar kopējo ceļu tīklu nesavienotus posmus, ja tie apvidū ir savienoti.

Not, it won't work. It's the same data source.

Reverted: changeset/145399206

Maps of Jāņa sēta ar a proprietary source and cannot be used in OSM. Changes must be reverted!

Jā, tā būtu pareizāk, izlaboju (changeset/143443237).

Zulip discussion: https://osmlatvija.github.io/zulip-archive/stream/358602-general/topic/R.C4.ABgas.20HES.20aizsargdambja.20ce.C4.BCu.20klasifik.C4.81cija.html
As a result, all road on top of the dam has been changed to cycleway (changeset/142873970).

Ways 1206245700 and 1206245697 are service roads connecting to the service road on the dam. For motor vehicles both are only for Zemkopības ministrijas nekustamie īpašumi (in OSM principles, "no" value). No matter the pedestrian/bike sign if there is one - treat it as designated on service way. Somehow service cars must access that service road on the dam also on Saulkalne side.

If correct level has already been added, it's redundant to add level:ref with a value that resembles addr:floor which anyway would be unnecessary as in Latvia always level+1=addr:floor.

Name source? Definitely not an official one (thus, shouldn't be under name tag). Also, due to misspelling, doesn't qualify even for a loc_name. Theoretically might be "Pļavupe", but as a local haven't heard of such.

No need to bother DWG. I agree that it's logical to discuss also on imports mailing list, simply it wasn't obviously stated at the Automated Edits code of conduct. Made some changes to fit into the text better (osm.wiki/w/index.php?title=Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct&diff=2432390&oldid=2432363).

As I answered to you on OpenStreetMap LV Signal group, I'll do that. When I'll have time. Before that wiki documentation (osm.wiki/Automated_edits/Latvia-bot) needs to be completed. To ease writing by limiting the need to edit afterwards, added also previous addresses which previously were meant to be left untouched by the bot.
Bot is running in production since June with updates every month and you were the first one to mention the need to post also in imports mailing list which isn't clearly stated under osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct ("or if your edit affects only one country or territory then standard communication methods for the territory affected by the change - typically national-language mailing lists or forums").

Yes, that would be better, corrected.

Lūgums salabot atpakaļ, kur nekorekti labots uz area:highway=*, pirms tam izlasot, kādos gadījumos to drīkst lietot (area:highway=*#Differentiation_area:highway_vs._area.3Dyes_on_a_highway). Piem., way/41803802 tas nav pieļaujams.

Nosaukumu jau nelaboju, arī visās agrākajās versijās ir "kultūras nams". Bet pareizi raksti, izlaboju.