OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
153386114

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673961

153385595

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673961

153384282

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673961

153383406

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673961

153358193

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673961

153356858

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673961

153356731

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673961

153356701

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673961

153356557

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673961

153355024

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673961

153354917

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673961

153354360

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673961

152873315

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673961

152869719

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673961

152869686

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673961

152867939

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673961

152867125

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673961

153609627

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673904

153609229

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673904

153558399

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673904