OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
153530838

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673904

153530100

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673904

153529754

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673904

153524053

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673904

153522868

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673904

153521351

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673904

153520986

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673904

153520613

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673904

153476141

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673904

153474740

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673904

153474614

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673904

153473153

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673904

153472794

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673904

153472690

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673904

153443703

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673904

153442095

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673904

153441559

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673904

153438854

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673904

153438590

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673904

153438367

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673904