CurlingMan13's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 149868060 | Changeset reverted |
|
| 149815203 | this is not how you add trees. Changeset reverted |
|
| 149811992 | changeset reverted in part or full |
|
| 149833437 | changeset reverted |
|
| 149745680 | Descriptive names should not be used |
|
| 149785326 | Changeset reverted in part or full |
|
| 149785085 | Do not wrap areas back upon themselves to simulate a hole. leisure=golf_course#:~:text=the%20building%20itself.-,Common%20mapping%20pitfalls,-Adding%20name%3D* |
|
| 149871211 | This is not how you add trees... |
|
| 149786696 | Also, this is NOT how you add trees... I have a feeling this is an alternate account as a result of your other account being blocked. |
|
| 149786696 | Do not partially overlap areas. Please review the following webpage to avoid your edits being reverted:
|
|
| 149870378 | Do not partially overlap areas. Please review the following webpage to avoid your edits being reverted:
|
|
| 149822738 | This changeset has been reverted in part or full. Item is movable and after further discussion, I am wrong. Portable features should not be mapped since they can move, however, just because it is "private" doesn't really mean it shouldn't be mapped. |
|
| 149821506 | I do request that better changeset comments be used to explain why they are being deleted, and not just "private." |
|
| 149821506 | I was thinking of it as no different from a pool, which we would map. But thinking about the portability side, I do concur it shouldn't be mapped. I disagree on the "private" argument, but the portability, I 100% agree. I am going to revert my revert. |
|
| 149821725 | This changeset has been reverted in part or full. If something is "private", then access tags should be used. They should not just be deleted. |
|
| 149821583 | This changeset has been reverted in part or full. If something is "private", then access tags should be used. They should not just be deleted. |
|
| 149821572 | This changeset has been reverted in part or full. If something is "private", then access tags should be used. They should not just be deleted. |
|
| 149821506 | This changeset has been reverted in part or full. If something is "private", then access tags should be used. They should not just be deleted. |
|
| 149821492 | This changeset has been reverted in part or full. If something is "private", then access tags should be used. They should not just be deleted. |
|
| 149821463 | This changeset has been reverted in part or full. If something is "private", then access tags should be used. They should not just be deleted. |