Instead of mapping each individual tree as a woods/forest, you should add a node if it is not in a cluster.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148065015

Isn't the checkdate just the same as when this business was added? A query could be use to determine this date based on when the node was created. Adding a check date just to match the date a node was added is dumb.

By adding a check date from so long ago, are you verifying that you checked it in 2013 and can testify that it existed then? What if it was added from fantasy mapping or via import but never actually checked? Are you confirming that you checked it in 2013?

How did you verify that they accept BTC/XBT?

How did you verify that they accept XBT/Crypto?

Especially since the XBT tag was only added 7 months ago, not 2015...

changeset/139203145

Did anyone actually verify they accept XBT? Putting a check date from 2015 is odd, especially now. Are you testifying that you checked that they accepted XBT in 2015?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147851962

You are still mapping such that landcovers are partially overlapping. I have mentioned this numerous times before, and directed you to the relevant wiki page. Please stop this practice.

Awesome. Thanks. I noticed by total sheer randomness. The nodes looked funny so I just had to investigate. lol.

:D

node/5925549448

node/1899574577

Not labeled as a bus stop.

What's up with adding wikidata to all the nodes of the PHX Skytrain, rather than just the ways?

Access tags for private driveways should be used instead of straight-up deletion of the way.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147925006

This house does not exist.

way/809251492

Was any in-person verification or survey actually performed?

Any update?

Name seems sus.

Only features that currently exist should be mapped. Segments over roadways where the rails have been completely removed have been removed. Segments in trees where existence cannot be confirmed were left.

railway=razed#:~:text=Mapping%20a%20feature%20without%20any%20physical%2C%20verifiable%20presence%20(Good%20practice%23Map%20what%27s%20on%20the%20ground)%20is%20considered%20out%20of%20scope%20for%20OSM

railway=abandoned#:~:text=mapping%20of%20non%2Dexistent%20railways%20as%20incorrect

They reverted your changeset, so it will need to be changed back, again.

changeset/147321589

ImJohn55, please stop. We know you are Bvonter23 based off of your IP and MAC address.

I'm on the fence about it. I removed it for now. Looks like it could be a ferry terminal, but idk, pier is good enough for now.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147224833

You should not remove features just because they are private. Access tags should be used instead.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147313689

Please do not make changes just for your golf game. Mapping for the renderer is not allowed on OSM.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147307736

Why did you change these parking lots to underground buildings? What is the reason for this changeset?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147307510