OpenStreetMap
CurlingMan13's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 148617485 | Nice of you to move it, but please, please, close out the anonymous notes you created when you resolve whatever the note is about |
|
| 148570685 | Please do not delete features that are clearly observable on aerial imagery. This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I also advise against using profane language. It goes against website policies. |
|
| 148570663 | Please do not delete features that are clearly observable on aerial imagery. This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I also advise against using profane language. It goes against website policies. |
|
| 148570636 | Please do not delete features that are clearly observable on aerial imagery. This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I also advise against using profane language. It goes against website policies. |
|
| 148570600 | Please do not delete features that are clearly observable on aerial imagery. This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I also advise against using profane language. It goes against website policies. |
|
| 148570713 | Please do not delete features that are clearly observable on aerial imagery. This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I also advise against using profane language. It goes against website policies. |
|
| 148570694 | Please do not delete features that are clearly observable on aerial imagery. This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I also advise against using profane language. It goes against website policies. |
|
| 148531976 | Added comment to original changeset. This was not a revert in the normal sense, but more of a cleanup. changeset/148526991
|
|
| 148526991 | This changeset was reverted in part or full. This is not the appropriate way to map private access. access=* tags should be used. you also added a ton of water lock gates which are used in canals. I went ahead and changed it for you in verifiable locations with the correct gate tags. Adding notes and names to ways/features does not align with OSM guidelines. osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
|
|
| 148445913 | Please do not delete and then readd features. Just manipulate what is on the map to reflect what it should be.
|
|
| 148365086 | When mapping landcovers, do not partially overlap the areas. |
|
| 148364459 | When adding buildings that are squarish, press "Q" to square up the corners and make them 90 degrees. |
|
| 148300943 | You should not remove features just because they are private. Access tags should be used instead. This changeset has been reverted in part or full. You can read why deletion is not the answer here:
|
|
| 148301025 | You should not remove features just because they are private. Access tags should be used instead. This changeset has been reverted in part or full. You can read why deletion is not the answer here:
|
|
| 148360819 | Access tags should be used instead of deletion. osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
|
|
| 148177328 | They never responded to their previous changeset. Do you plan on reverting this changeset?
|
|
| 148152874 | When adding buildings. Use "Q" to square up the corners and make them 90 degrees.
|
|
| 148111787 | You mentioned before "ok, got it", but you are continuing to map landcovers such that they partially overlap... |
|
| 148098864 | The circumference of this tree is, more definite than not, 20m. Please review:
The largest tree in the world is:
|
|
| 148060874 | When mapping landcovers, please do not partially overlap them.
|