As with all the others, the cartpaths should not be named. Also, do not "lollipop" features such as the fairway around the sand bunker.

Hi again... Please do not use descriptive tags to describe a cartpath. It has been addressed. Also, the sections that are a bridge over water should be changed to a bridge.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138484184

cartpaths should not be named. Also, bridges should be added where it goes over water, as appropriate.

Revert changeset didn't work

changeset/138475016

Why did you remove road names? This is being reverted in part or full to restore info that was removed.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138456227

1) Please use changeset comments and include what you changed and why.

2) This is not a bridge. The other way should have been a tunnel. Fixed.
way/879104396

You should square the buildings using "q" to make them square with right angles.

You should square the buildings using "q" to make them square with right angles. This changeset requires some cleanup to address this. Other features should be checked as well.

Please use more detailed changeset comments. What did you change, and why?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138442809

They wasted no time to change it back...

changeset/138241722

Looks like they just ignored you and did it again everywhere.

I mean, regardless of whether it is closed or not, the fact that there are vendors here pretty much confirms it is a pedestrian area.

Can you elaborate on why this isn't a pedestrian area?

highway=pedestrian

The user got rid of the pedestrian tags again...

changeset/138241957

They did here among a few others. Might be worth shooting a message off to DWG.

Looks good. FYI - you can also add private driveways at the end, being sure to use the tag "access=private"

This would highlight the fact of where the road ends.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138400959

FYI, if you don't feel like adding in a building (obvious if they don't resemble what is on the imagery), then you can just place nodes/points instead.

Are these the actual names of the trees or are they just the type of tree?

Reverting changeset since access tags should be used instead of deleting the ways.

Read more here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

changeset/138401033

Reverting changeset since access tags should be used instead of deleting the ways.

Read more here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

Do not re-delete features. This has already been discussed in your previous changesets, such as:
changeset/137812590

changeset/138401025

Reverting changeset since access tags should be used instead of deleting the ways.

Read more here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

changeset/138400557

What's the deal with not adding bridge cartpaths over the water?

actually - added details and closed a note.