Areas should not overlap, or if they do, the larger area should be fully enclosed. For example, I fixed this one:
way/1192129272
They partially overlaped when you did it. The system can not determine which belong on top, so it throws error flags and alerts others that there is an issue.

There are 2 ways to do it:
1) Don't overlap. Have them either touch or not touch, but no overlap.
2) Have the "bottom"/"larger" one go completely around the smaller one. For example, how the tennis courts (smaller) are fully within the part area.

"private" features should not be deleted. They should be tagged with access=private instead. This changeset has been reverted. You can read more on why private features won't be deleted here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

changeset/139016760

Use more detailed changeset comments. What did you change, and why? Quick comment goes a long ways.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138912423

Just because they are private doesn't necessarily mean they are service roads. They look almost like living streets, residential or alley.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138814845

updated old railways into cyclepaths as seen on aerial imagery.

This changeset has been reverted. Private roads/driveways should use access tags, and not be deleted. You can read more on why here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

changeset/138827436

This changeset has been reverted. Private roads/driveways should use access tags, and not be deleted. You can read more on why here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

changeset/138827436

No problem. Yeah, it is counter-intuitive. There's like a whole wiki page on it if I recall correctly.

It shouldn't be changed to access=yes. The access tag should just be removed and left blank. Setting it to "yes" for all access causes error flags to be thrown.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138779073

Not sure why the pool was drawn so big, but I have cleaned it up

Do not change waterways into golf features. This is not correct and has been reverted in part or full.

I'm pretty sure I have commented before on other edits by you. When you are adding roads, do not add them incorrectly as golf cartpaths simply for your game or whatever. They should be added using the correct tags.

Specific roads in question - the parking lot.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138720057

Don't add features as tunnels when none exists.

FYI, this should all be one parking area. You can add individual parking spaces on top, but it shouldn't be divided up like it is here. I have resolved it here, but other areas in this region need attention.

Added it back in as a private driveway.

Landuse/Landcover and roads should not be snapped to power lines. I have cleaned up the portion by the golf course.

Good enough of an edit. Thanks for joining and taking care of it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138525952

Good enough of an edit. Thanks for joining and taking care of it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138525952

Where did you get the reference # info?

I know you got the shape from street imagery, but reference info isn't visible there.

I just want to make sure it is correct - if you know what I mean.

Also, welcome to OSM!

Again, do not name cartpaths. this changeset has been reverted in part or full.