Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap,

Thanks for your contributions to traced building outlines in Northern Tehran.
I spotted that you did connect a few building outlines to adjacent ways. This should be avoided as these objects are not physically connected unless the way leads to a parking entrance or passed through a building. It can happen easily during editing though thanks to the "snap to nearest way" functionality. Just be on the lookout for that.
You can see how I fixed this by moving he building nodes away from the ways'. Visualized here: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68094146

Hi,
You have added an area feature with a few tags that look like they originate from another system. None are recognized within the OpenStreetMap project.
Would you mind reviewing the tagging, remove all that are irrelevant and add some that specify the area use?
From satellite imagery it looks like this could be a residential lot. So you could tag the outline with barrier=wall or the northern part with the building as building=apartments

Und die Brillenpinguine sind jetzt im Zoo Berlin während des Umbaus des Aquariums

Ah. Indeed. I totally overlooked these, because this is the established and documented standard for tagging the reference for runways. These are the first ten and hundred digits of the degree value of the runway heading. See aeroway=runway
Maybe we should teach OSMcha to not flag these...

Hm… i can't see where I added multiple values with a slash. I can see OSMcha complaining about it as well, but no pointer at which object it refers to. Any hint?

source for the tracing in this changeset was DigitalGlobe imagery

Das war schnell! Kudos.

Hello and welcome again to OpenStreetMap,
Thanks for your contributions. You added many ways from Bing satellite imagery. But you did not specify which type of way they are. To do that you need to add a highway tag. If these are roads in a residential area just tag them as highway=residential

You can find more information about highways in this wiki article in Persian:
osm.wiki/Fa:Highways

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap,
You added mosque, but didn't add the religion tag. For the place to be recognised as a mosque you need to add religion=muslim to "مسجد توحید". And to further specify either use denomination=shia or denomination=sunni

If the path is still visible on the ground I would agree with the current tagging. Is the access forbidden though? Or is it not advisable?

There were many directly imported GPS track which were not simplified. E.g. for a straight line between two points it contained 8+ nodes. I used JOSM's "Simplify way" to reduce geometry complexity. Since these were multiple 4x4 off-road tracks through the Kavir this resulted in 42K deletions over a few changesets.

There were many directly imported GPS track which were not simplified. E.g. for a straight line between two points it contained 8+ nodes. I used JOSM's "Simplify way" to reduce geometry complexity. Since these were multiple 4x4 off-road tracks through the Kavir this resulted in 42K deletions over a few changesets.

There were many directly imported GPS track which were not simplified. E.g. for a straight line between two points it contained 8+ nodes. I used JOSM's "Simplify way" to reduce geometry complexity. Since these were multiple 4x4 off-road tracks through the Kavir this resulted in 42K deletions over a few changesets.

There were many directly imported GPS track which were not simplified. E.g. for a straight line between two points it contained 8+ nodes. I used JOSM's "Simplify way" to reduce geometry complexity. Since these were multiple 4x4 off-road tracks through the Kavir this resulted in 42K deletions over a few changesets.

There were many directly imported GPS track which were not simplified. E.g. for a straight line between two points it contained 8+ nodes. I used JOSM's "Simplify way" to reduce geometry complexity. Since these were multiple 4x4 off-road tracks through the Kavir this resulted in 42K deletions over a few changesets.

Hi,
You have been adding a few admin boundaries with "source snapp". Can you please clarify what your source for these boundary ways is? I hope it is not the map of "Snapp" ride hailing app as that is Google Maps and can't be used to source boundaries.

Hi Amin,

With this and your previous changesets you kept removing the English name (in the name:en tag value). You only left the Persian name both in the name and duplicated in the name:fa tags for multiple streets. Is there a specific reason why you are removing English names?

Your fellow mapper Reza_koulivand from Borujerd also reached out to you about this multiple times over the last months and it would be very kind if you could respond.

These tracks that you have added: Are these actually marked tracks? Or is that a route you took crossing the desert on your own?
Judging from satellite imagery only part of it seem to actually be permanent tracks. The other half you were driving through the desert.

Hi,
For the name of the subway entrances please use the name of the exit, not of the station. The name of the station will be derived via the stop area relation. But the idea is that you can tell exits apart, e.g. "Weteringschans East"(Just made up, I do not know namings of the Vijzelgracht exits). Sometimes subway exits have additional references (1, 2, 3, 4 or A, B, C D) which you can add in the ref-Tag.

Can you explain why you deleted the metro station Teatros, including elevator infrastructure. Also you deleted the butcher shop nearby. I cannot see how this is related to a HotOSM project to *add* buildings, roads and water