I've rechecked this object. And now there is no key, which is different to the bus stop on the other site of the street (node/486583713). So There is nothing to do.

Reverted in changeset/40212958

Have a look at note/593525

Have a look at changeset/40212741

Have a look at changeset/40212741

I've added some more information about this location.

Have a look at this changeset:
changeset/40211885

Yes, I had set a note and the mapper edward17 wrote directly if I could change it to old_name:uk.

Because the key Departement is used over 64k times. And represented the same like in this objects.

But now I see that in the most cases the fixed value "Ogooué et Lac", which is a local department in Gabon.

I found the key in Taginfo, loaded it via Overpass API to JOSM, use the search functions to select all features with the key and finally I changed the key to the "correct" one.
I have no look on each feature or check every tagging on them.

Hi Jan,

the origin changeset was an automatically process as well. So I'm on my way to revert all of my changes like this.

Chriss

Have a look at
@ChrissW-R1/history
to observe the process

I'm on my way to revert all of my changesets.
Please be patient...

JFYI: http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/telephone

Hi aseerel4c26,

I've changed all telephone tags, which contains only a phone number and have no other phone tag to the contact:phone tag.

The telephone key will be used for infrastructure feature and not for contact information.

It was a semi-automatic change with JOSM.

Sincerely yours
Chriss

Thank you for your help. I didn't know, that there are two systems with different name.

Are these systems also technically different? Or does they have just different names?

Oh I see, sorry. It is reverted in changeset/35405632

In this case you are right. I was to fast and didn't see the tag "ref:name", on which the changed tag references to. So I reverted it in changeset changeset/35404804.

But you are wrong, if you think that I only take mechanical changes. I know the rules of these automated edits. I used the taginfo tools to find anomalies in the data. In many other changesets of me, you could see, that the keepright and other tools were used to verify the changes.

That's not correct. I used the taginfo tool to find similar tags.
The key "source:prow:ref" (http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/source%3Aprow%3Aref) only existed in the way way/3063948/history. The key "source:prow_ref" (http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/source%3Aprow_ref), in which I changed it to, exists in more than ten thousand features! In addition, the value fits to the new key.

I agree to your decision. You entered a prefix to the key like abandoned or disused.

Sorry for this. I had changed it because "unsigned:ref" only appears in this two features in the complete database!

But you're right, this is the correct tagging schema and so I'll revert it.