The left lane marked is not officially a cycling lane according to Boisbriand. Cars are parked there and there is no sign at all. Can you confirm it is a cycling lane and not a parking lane? As of 2022, most of the lane is completely erased too.

Please don't add abandoned railways that were dismanteled decades ago. If there is no rail left on the ground, it should not be mapped at all, except when there is a historical need to keep the abandoned/disused tag, like on the Petit Train du Nord in Laurentides.

Thanks! Be careful though to add the Bing offset as follow: 0.6,-1.54

Merci! Par contre attention à l'alignement de Bing qui doit être 0.6,-1.54

Parfait!

(Writing in english for other users, but feel free to answer in french)

Hi!

The golfcart paths and footpaths should be connected to the rest of the road network otherwise it could create incorrect routings in routing engines (these are called unconnected islands). I don't know if it would be best to remove them all or to create artificial road connections... I'll let you decide.

You can keep only the official moh name in the name tag. Using dual language in the name tag with a dash is not standard. I'll fix it. Thanks for adding moh names!

Please do not "try" stuff on openstretmap. There is no hospital there. I will revert your change.

You're right it is the whole building. Not a big problem, it is just that in this area, we separated 100% of the POIs from their building for consistency. I changed it back to a node just for this reason. Thanks for updating the data though!

Please keep POIs separate from buildings when possible. It makes updates easier and it makes it possible to add multiple POIs inside a single building. It also helps having the POIs near their entrance. Thanks!

Yes I know, sorry. This is the change that has been made:
change [crossing=uncontrolled] with [crossing:markings=no] to [crossing=unmarked] (removed crossing:markings)

Yes automated edit to follow the new approved wiki page on crossing:markings and uncontrolled/unmarked crossings. Should be fine though. Did it trigger an error or something?

Hi! I am not sure I understand what you were trying to do with this edit. You move sidewalks all around and misaligned them. The correct alignment for Bing Maps is 0.6,-1.54
I will have to revert most of your edits. Thanks for your understanding.

Please do not add survey metadata. Or at least do not use landuse tags to map them. Thanks!

Sorry, did not see that the commercial are was not from you. Forget the previous message!

Please do not add landuse area on top of roads. They must be separated. Also, it seems you are doing an analysis. Please explain what was the goal of adding this data?

No problem, thanks!

This segment should be 4 lanes (2 forward, 2 backward) since the transition starts at the beginning (see width:lanes)

There are 3 lanes there indeed. Fixed it.