OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
179502335

There is no such project. Pure fantasy.

179556606

Please provide the source for this data, and explain the rationale.

179556606

Vandalism

179271953

OK, thanks! Do you have the address of where they moved?

179271953

Do you confirm these shops are all closed permanently?

179009848

Sorry, I meant adding an area with landuse=construction around the zone so we do not forget to validate this later on.

179009848

Ok, that's fine, but please add a construction area around the zone so we know it may change in the near future.

179009848

Are you sure this section is no longer a public road?

Or is it temporary?

And please give meaningful changest comments and provide the street-level imagery so we can see where this come from.

178749074

Oui, c'est le polygone du terrain. C'est souvent le cas pour les écoles et les hôpitaux de nommer le lieu sur le polygone complet. Ça peut aussi être un multipolygone dans certains cas.

178749074

J'ai ajouté l'entrée principale. Par contre, ce point créait un duplicat avec l'amenity hospital déjà défini par le polygone, que j'ai retiré.

178705686

OK, thanks for the info. However, the fact that the crossing is unsafe is information that should be added to another layer outside of openstreetmap. In Quebec, it is legal to cross the street at any intersection, except where there is a forbidden sign for pedestrian, which is very rare and not the case here. Thanks and have a nice day!

178642554

OK, j'ai ajouté un issue sur leur repo: https://source.mapcomplete.org/MapComplete/MapComplete/issues/2637

178705686

Hi! Can you explain the rationale for this change? the delivery driveway was disconnected from the main road. Thanks! (I fixed it already)

178642554

Bonjour!

Merci d'avoir ajouté les limtes des vitesse.

Par contre, dans le wiki OSM pour le tag maxspeed, on dit ceci:

"The maximum fixed numeric speed limit, followed by the appropriate unit, if not measured in km/h. When the value is in km/h then no unit should be included."

Donc pour les prochaines, juste mettre le nombre sans unité.

Merci et bonne journée!

178483234

Added informal=yes :-)

178483234

Yes, no problem, or add informal=yes
:-)

178483234

The main issue is that almost nobody will cross the street twice if they arrive on the opposite side, so we feel it better model the real paths of pedestrian. And a routing engine that will tell you to cross the street twice instead of once would feel weird too for the end-user. In places like Japan, this would be quite different (people will cross mostly at marked crosswalk and accept more detours).

178483234

Hi!

In Quebec, it is legal to cross the street at any intersection, on either side, except when there is a no-pedestrian sign at the intersection, which is rare and not present at this intersection. For this reason, please keep the unmarked crossings so routing can follow the law. The fact that it could be dangerous or difficult to cross at some periods of the day should be the responsibility of tools external to OSM. I have put back the crossing. Thanks and have a nice day!

178318866

Hi! At Villa Maria, I had to remove the footways you added since there is no separate sidewalk, but instead the footway is shared with the road. There is already a foot=yes tag for pedestrian routing. Thanks and have a nice day!

148617632

Yes, it was a mistake, I will fix! Thanks!