ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 173681285 | cool merci! |
|
| 173681285 | Oui exact, il faut mettre des conditionals. |
|
| 173681285 | Salut!
|
|
| 173348559 | Hi!
|
|
| 173334572 | Ces allées n'appartiennent pas à la ville et sont des accès privés aux résidences et à leurs stationnements. Ce n'est donc pas une rue résidentielle. Pouvez-vous corriger SVP?
|
|
| 172716338 | I do not recommend it either, but to access shops on the roadside, we must keep foot access. Thanks! |
|
| 173105150 | See here: it could be correct/legit to add the footway=sidewalk tag here: |
|
| 173105150 | It is indeed possible to check for the footway=sidewalk tag, but the issue would be that if you want to analyse the presence of sidewalks/separated footways on all roads, it would then reduce this road to a one-sided separated footway access. Two solution: add the footway=sidewalk to the cycling path, which could be weird, but accurate in this case, or count cycleways alongside roads as a sidewalk. |
|
| 173105150 | Hi! The cycleway on the right is accessible to pedestrian, thus usable as a sidewalk. |
|
| 173049776 | Please do not fix valid data. There was a placement=transition which was connected at the beginning of the theoretical gore. The data was correct. I will revert. Sorry for the inconvenience and have a nice day! |
|
| 173090977 | Reverting. This was correct. Thanks and sorry for the inconvenience. |
|
| 173090272 | Alignment was correct and followed the theoretical gore with placement=transition. Please do not fix non-errors. Short segments are quite ok when precise data is drawn. Thanks! |
|
| 173043543 | In Quebec, when we validate and complete the data in a specific area like this one, we are adding very precise data, so very short segments are often created. This is not an error. Thanks! |
|
| 173043543 | Thanks! |
|
| 173043543 | Hi!
|
|
| 172818230 | Thanks! |
|
| 162070381 | No problem thanks! |
|
| 172858639 | Also, can you confirm that the crossings at Meilleur/Sauvé are zebra and not lines? The last photo from June 2025 has lines, and not zebra. |
|
| 172858639 | Hi! Thanks for the updates in Ahuntsic. However, please use cycleway=lane instead of track when only flex posts are installed. See wiki specific to Canada about this: osm.wiki/Canada#Mapping_cycleways Thanks! |
|
| 172818230 | Please contact your whole team so I do not have to revert multiple times. Thanks! Sorry for the typos in the previous message! Have a nice day! |