OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
173681285

cool merci!

173681285

Oui exact, il faut mettre des conditionals.

173681285

Salut!
Il y a bel et bien des pancartes Bus/Taxi/Vélo pour la voie de droite depuis un certain temps. share_busway, c'est pour ça?

173348559

Hi!
This data was correct and was aligned using geodesic data. I will fix the alignment. Thanks and have a nice day!

173334572

Ces allées n'appartiennent pas à la ville et sont des accès privés aux résidences et à leurs stationnements. Ce n'est donc pas une rue résidentielle. Pouvez-vous corriger SVP?
Merci et bonne journée!

172716338

I do not recommend it either, but to access shops on the roadside, we must keep foot access. Thanks!

173105150

See here: it could be correct/legit to add the footway=sidewalk tag here:

osm.wiki/Sidewalks#Cycleway_and_footway_on_sidewalk

173105150

It is indeed possible to check for the footway=sidewalk tag, but the issue would be that if you want to analyse the presence of sidewalks/separated footways on all roads, it would then reduce this road to a one-sided separated footway access. Two solution: add the footway=sidewalk to the cycling path, which could be weird, but accurate in this case, or count cycleways alongside roads as a sidewalk.

173105150

Hi! The cycleway on the right is accessible to pedestrian, thus usable as a sidewalk.

173049776

Please do not fix valid data. There was a placement=transition which was connected at the beginning of the theoretical gore. The data was correct. I will revert. Sorry for the inconvenience and have a nice day!

173090977

Reverting. This was correct. Thanks and sorry for the inconvenience.

173090272

Alignment was correct and followed the theoretical gore with placement=transition. Please do not fix non-errors. Short segments are quite ok when precise data is drawn. Thanks!

173043543

In Quebec, when we validate and complete the data in a specific area like this one, we are adding very precise data, so very short segments are often created. This is not an error. Thanks!

173043543

Thanks!

173043543

Hi!
The geometry was correct by following the theoretical gore. What was wrong and what kind of error were you trying to fix? Thanks!

172818230

Thanks!

162070381

No problem thanks!

172858639

Also, can you confirm that the crossings at Meilleur/Sauvé are zebra and not lines? The last photo from June 2025 has lines, and not zebra.

172858639

Hi! Thanks for the updates in Ahuntsic. However, please use cycleway=lane instead of track when only flex posts are installed. See wiki specific to Canada about this: osm.wiki/Canada#Mapping_cycleways

Thanks!

172818230

Please contact your whole team so I do not have to revert multiple times. Thanks! Sorry for the typos in the previous message! Have a nice day!