Thanks!

Attention aussi avec l'utilisation de Google Street View. Au Canada, il y le concept de Fair Use et le fait que des photos non artistiques prises de la rue ne peuvent pas être protégées par copyright, mais ce n'est pas le cas partout, alors on suggère d'éviter d'utiliser les photos Google StreetView pour validation, ou en tout de les utiliser en dernier recours en s'assurant que d'aller sur place ne ferait aucune différence.

Je comprends. La problématique de départ était que le REV à Montréal était cartographié comme track ou lane et les gens disaient qu c'était beaucoup plus sécuritaire que ça et que ça devait être dessiné séparément. Il y a eu discussion, et on a décidé de mettre une voie séparée dès qu'il y a une séparation physique au moins aux intersections ou même une voie de stationnement permanente. Dans OSM, tout ce qui est séparé physiquement ou qui change de surface peut en théorie être dessiné séparément de la rue. Ici, il y a une bordure de béton, donc si quelqu'un la dessine séparément, c'est valide et il ne faut pas l'enlever. Le fait que ce soit sécuritaire ou agréable doit être spécifié dans d'autres outils qu'OSM malheureusement (pour l'instant). Dans le wiki canadien, la seule chose qu'on considère comme n'étant pas une séparation physique, ce sont des bollards amovibles (flex-post) parce qu'ils sont retirés l'hiver et souvent on ne les remet même pas certaines années ou on les remet très tard dans la saison estivale.

This has been discussed heavily with the Canadian community and the actual wiki page in the Canada section has been chosen as the consensus. I understand your view though. There are tools that can analyse the neighbourhood of a cycling path and that can calculate distance from the nearest roads and from buildings that could give you way more details about how the cycling path is built and around what kind of features.

I fixed it already, you can see the changes by reloading the editor. The kerb is lowered for driveways but is raised between them and has a concrete separator.

I fixed it already, you can see the changes by reloading the editor. The kerb is lowered for driveways but is raised between them and has a concrete separator.

Perfect thanks

Hi!

There is a kerb there separating the road from the cycling path. Please read osm.wiki/Canada#Mapping_cycleways

Thanks!

Is there a reason why these entrances were changed? In the Montreal area, the home;main entrances are entrances to elderly centres, which includes offices, shops and homes, hence the dual entrance tag.

The issue is for routing. This intersection is easy to cross late at night or on weekends when traffic is low and it is always legal. The fact that it would be impracticable on rush hour should be specified in other tools, outside of OSM. Removing these kind of crossings would break routing all over Quebec since it would not allow pedestrian to cross in most villages and towns or in rural area too. I would suggest to keep them active and use another tool to specify if it is dangerous or difficult to use during some periods of the day. I understand that the wiki is saying that there should be a kerb or something to specify it is a valid crossing, though unmarked, but in that case, it would make pedestrian routing completely unrealistic. Some municipalities in Quebec have long stretches of roads without any kerb but with sidewalks on both sides and multiple unmarked intersections. Removing the unmarked crossings would make routing unusable for pedestrians.

Hi! Can you add a source to that info? The community decided some time ago to call the REM a light rail system. Changing it to subway should be discussed with the community on https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/ca/95

Not sure, this is a public secondary school and it is accessible to the public outside school hours. However, right now, this school is under heavy renovations

ok, je vais mettre bicycle=dismount
Merci!

Comme on avait discuté, ce sont des liens pour permettre aux vélos d'accéder aux parcs. C'est pour ça que j'avais retiré cycleway=crossing et remplacé par footway=crossing

OK, no problem. In the wiki, it says access=yes is implicit, but can be added for more precise information. Thanks!

I think access=yes is implicit. Did StreetComplete complained this was needed?

Ok, I see the sidewalk was added with bicycle=dismount. So the tag on the road should be bicycle=use_sidepath ?

Are you sure bicycle are not permitted there with a no bicycle sign? How do cyclists access the funeral home and the large factory there?

Au plaisir!

Si les piétons sont désignés dans la voie cyclable, on met sidewalk:right=shared
et sidewalk:left=no
Je m'en occupe