absolutely no problem! I as doing the same some years ago!

You can contact me anytime for more info

This part of the cycling path is a lane, not a separate path. When there is no physical separation between the cycleway and the road, please use the cycleway:both/left/right tags on the road itself. For a separate drawing, there must be a barrier (fence) a curb or concrete separators. Thanks!

Oh désolé, vous pouvez corriger!

Voici la photo de juillet 2023 (Streetview):
https://ibb.co/w7bwCd1

There is a curb now. The cycling path is not on the road but separated now

Removing this crossing makes cycling routing fail, because now the park is not accessible by bike rom Rue Saint-Hubert north of the service road to Cour Municipale. I will add it back.

Je suis plutôt d'accord, mais il faudrait le mentionner dans un forum auprès de la communauté, car comme j'ai dit, je n'ai fait qu'aligner ce qui était déjà là.

C’était déjà là je n’ai que corrigé les alignements. Mais de toute façon on est vraiment dans une zone grise ici car c’est pour une longue durée. Ça mériterait de demander sur la mailing list ce que les gens en pensent. Combien d’années de chantier pour considérer comme permanent? Car si on garde la géométrie précédente pré-construction, le routing ne fonctionnera pas jusqu’en 2025 minimum.

Merci pour vos contributions!

I rarely go on Slack, so sorry for not having seen your messages ;-)

I think the cycleway:separation is the tag to use here instead of changing to track, but I will accept it. In the last month, they added concrete separations at some intersections so I guess it becomes like the REV which is mapped separately. So in the future I suggest mapping these separately like the REV. Would it be correct? I still think cycleway=track should be temporary and replaced by a separated way as soon as possible if there is a physical separation. It is like sidewalk=both;left;right, which should be replaced by sidewalk:both/left/right=separate with the sidewalks mapped separately as soon as someone has the time to do it.

This bicycle lane should be tagged as lane. A track would mean a physicial separation other than flex bollards and/or paint (and is usually mapped separately instead). There is already a cycleway:separation tag specifying that the cycleway is separated by a buffer. Thanks!

Why did you change the motorway highway tag to a gate? This breaks routing. What were you trying to do exactly? And please write useful changeset messages.

interior mapping in osm is still a pain, but thanks for adding data.

Can you add a source for these indoor corridors? They seem a bit random and not so precise, compared to what was already mapped. We should get a precise map of the airport to map these.

It is mapped as a mulitpolygon, since the motel has three associated building. This is usual to map associated building (same business) as multipolygons.

Reverted in changeset/139875279

Only motorways and roads with specific pedestrian prohibited signs roads cannot be walked in Quebec. There is no such sign there.

This road is not prohibited for pedestrian. It is not pedestrian-friendly, but people can walk on the side of the road. Please revert.

No problem! I already downloaded the historical data for this tag for backup. Please refer to the revert changeset here if possible. Thanks!