ok, perfect!

Is this section of the REV oneway or two-way?

This crossing was correct. Reverted back.

This is indeed a long crossing, alongside a parking lot. Vehicles can cross anywhere along this segment. I fixed it. Thanks!

OK, can you send me a private message with her contact information? Thanks!

As a rule of thumb, you should never align anything on map that is already there unless you are sure that your aerial imagery is calibrated. The one we use is (Géodésie Québec), but we cannot share it with the community because the servers cannot handle more than a few requests. What is the team Emilie Gamelin? Where can I find contact information for this team? Thanks!

Thanks for the update. However, we should keep the crossings there, because otherwise routing cannot access the pedestrian street since both Avenue Girouard and Avenue Earnscliffe have foot=use_sidepath. I added them back. Thanks!

Hi!

Please do not realign buildings that were aligned using official geodesic data. Bing and other aerial imagery are not aligned correctly in this area.

Hi! Please add access=private to private pools so routing engines don't think these are publicly accessible pools. Thanks!

Please use correct tagging when mapping buildings, pools and other features. Read the official openstreetmap wiki please. Thanks!

No problem thanks! Have a nice day!

Hi! Why did you remove traffic signals tags for foot and cyclists here? uncontrolled is only when there is no traffic signals, and markings=yes is less precise than markings=lines

ok, perfect thanks!

Hi! Please add access=private to private pool to make sure routing engines don't send people there thinking these are publicly accessible pools.

This is indeed a long crossing. False positive. I reverted it back to a crossing

Hi! Please add access=private to private pools otherwise routing engines could send people there thinking these are publicly accessible pools. Thanks!

Hi! Please add access=private to private swimming pools otherwise routing engine will send people there thinking these are publicly accessible pools.

Thanks! Should we also consider that any valid shop value should also be valid for trade?

Were the stops removed? We still see them in 2022 imagery

I'm sorry! I was not aware of the revert. Maybe there was a conflict? usually when there are conflicts I verify that nothing is deleted, but it may occur from time to time since the conflicts resolution system is sometime erroneous in the iD editor... I can try to fix the 36 Monk route as soon as possible. Sorry for that!