When used carefully, inspecting each candidate building against appropriate imagery to ensure that it (1) exists and (2) is traced properly, RapID is an accepted tool.

When using it as you are, importing buildings at rates in excess of one per second, it falls solidly under the import guidelines.

And shifting the burden of error checking onto me is unacceptable. It takes about five minutes to inspect each changeset, or longer if I need to fix anything. The 600 or so changesets you've made in the past day will take me about a month to review if everything is perfect; given the number of errors I've found so far, three to four months is a more reasonable estimate.

Please read osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines and the rest of osm.wiki/Category:Import_Policy -- the standard for imports is "guilty until proven innocent".

I'd prefer not to revert it myself -- the Data Working Group has better tools and more experience than I do.

The change I feel necessary is to revert everything you've done since changeset #111471825 as an undiscussed import. Do you agree?

Which renderer are you using that is so incredibly broken that it ignores some building types?

The correct thing to do is to fix the renderer, not break the map.

Is there a reason why you think that Maplewood Gardens, The Academy, Altura, and The Highline shouldn't be apartment buildings, or is it just that RapID is allergic to classifying building types?

You're clearly not spending enough, if any, time reviewing things. One of the "buildings" in this changeset is a travel trailer, and another only vaguely resembles the actual structure on the ground.

Please stop.

Please stop adding low-quality scribbles to the map.

Please don't. We're supposed to be getting a much better set of building outlines to import from in the near future.

What sort of a business is a "Chris O'Doherty - Windermere"? It's useful to tag that so people can find it when searching by type, not just when searching by name.

It would be nice if you explained *why* you're changing the road classification. The last person to do so did.

You've changed the official name of the United States to "ur=ریاست ہائے متحدہ". Do you plan to fix this?

What sort of a thing is "Pandora"? I'm pretty sure that "park" isn't the correct tag for it.

I've noticed a few errors in this changeset:

* Where southbound Ash Street divides in two, both sides of the split are roads, and both of them go by the name "Ash Street".
* There's a similar issue where southbound Maple Street comes off the bridge: both pieces prior to the merge are roads known as "Maple Street".
* 4th Avenue west of Maple isn't an arterial: the speed limit is 25 mph and cross streets don't have stop signs. This means it should be tagged as "unclassified", not "tertiary".

I'm also not sure the classification of Sprague Way is correct: yes, it's the primary connection between two major streets, but it is not itself a major street.

Really damn minor state route.

You added the description "Adequate gravel Equestrian Trailer parking" to a number of things that don't look much like parking lots. Was this a mistake?

When you merged the road, you also tagged the whole thing as a bridge, and dropped the units on the speed limit (so it's now marked as 35 km/h rather than 35 mph). I've fixed it, but please be more careful in the future.

Your aim seems to be a bit off: you renamed Silver Creek as "South 3rd Street".

Please don't use Esri Clarity when deciding if something still exists or not -- it's the oldest available imagery. Relying on it can cause you to delete driveways that were recently constructed, like you did in Deer Park.

You've drawn the Trout Creek NRT as overlapping the Hope Valley road. Do the two share a route?

Looks good to me.