Where did you get the routing of the "Etter Ranch Access Trail" from? I went hiking there last Saturday, and while the lower section is pretty much spot-on (except for the name), the upper section bears no resemblance to reality.

Are you sure about those trails you added? Only one of them corresponds to a junction I noted in an on-the-ground survey.

General practice in OpenStreetMap is to put the most-common name in the "name" field: we map the world as it is, not as we wish it was.

Assuming the Puyallup tribe still uses "Tahoma" as the name of the mountain, it should go in either the "name:lut" field (if you're sure that it's the original Lushootseed name), or "name:sal" if you're not sure which Salishan language it's from.

Most of the relations seem to have come through okay, though there was some weirdness in the Bus 63 route master relation that I fixed.

The problem with this changeset is that when you split US-2 at the intersection, you didn't bring *any* of the road attributes over to the new one-way segments -- not even the name of the road.

Have they finished re-building the bridge? Last I heard, construction wasn't scheduled to be finished until sometime next year.

You appear to have merged five different features in Noxon to produce a single post office/church/museum/town/fire station. What happened?

OpenStreetMap is about mapping what's there, not what we wish was there.

Not every use of the name "Forest" is wrong. You removed the name from two roads, a building, and a city district.

I've reverted this changeset.

It would be useful to know what roads have been changed and why, particularly when you're bumping a road's importance by two grades, or adding a major road that doesn't show up in any aerial imagery.

Could you please be more careful? When you updated the alignment, you deleted the lane count, speed limit, and other useful information from the existing section of road.

Four errors:

1) A patio roof mapped as a separate building.
2) Two buildings mapped as one.
3) A building outline showing a courtyard that doesn't exist.
4) A temporary tent mapped as a permanent building.

*Sigh*

Is there a reason why you added pedestrian crossings in the middle of nowhere in Canada and the United States?

You've tagged a power line as a primary road here. I've undone it, but please be more careful in the future.

I've reverted this changeset.

I've reverted this changeset. Just like last time, the things you deleted were correctly labeled as private driveways.

Two of the three things you deleted were marked as "private driveway", not "road". The correct thing to do would have been to mark the third one as a private driveway as well.

The "description" field is intended for information that doesn't fit in the structured tags, such as what sort of real estate services are offered. It's not a place to write a promotional blurb for your business.

Three errors:

1) Removal of "building=apartments" tags from two buildings.
2) Mapping four buildings as one.
3) A building outline is about 25% larger than the building.

Three errors:

1) A building missing a quarter of its outline.
2) Two buildings mapped as one.
3) Three buildings mapped as one.

Two errors:

1) A building missing a corner
2) Two buildings mapped as one.