Bexhill-OSM's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 126553877 | Thanks for your feedback, I'll look into it soon.
|
|
| 127296000 | The description tagging on the house in Belle Hill is inappropriate. I will be reverting your changes. |
|
| 125447190 | I made those changes in 126553877 |
|
| 125447190 | We have a local project here that uses these semicolons, hence why these changes to the tag name wouldn't really work.
|
|
| 125447190 | What is failing? Using images seperated by semicolons is much less obnoxious than creating a whole new tag name based on the images description? |
|
| 125376764 | I've reverted this change as the turn restriction is a reference to Albert Road, a one way street. |
|
| 125376764 | The sign can be seen just past the driveway - https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=199221988591840&focus=photo |
|
| 125376764 | I believe the no_right_turn restriction is in reference to Albert Road (a one-way street), not the small service driveway? |
|
| 122248611 | I also set these roads to narrow=yes, but I guess StreetComplete doesn't give you the option. I'll set it next time I do an update. |
|
| 114040921 | Sounds a good resolution. I've gone and split the schools as best I can, hopefully I got the URPN's the right way round.
|
|
| 118881456 | Ahh, thanks for the clarification! |
|
| 118881456 | Hi, any reason why you have changed the rail bridge geometries to only suspended areas, not including supports? man_made=bridge clearly shows it should be mapped as a whole. |
|
| 114116518 | Nice. I do love a bit of sneaky solar :) |
|
| 114101623 | Hey thanks! You have a good eye :) |
|
| 113631812 | Yeah I wasn't sure, hence I why flipflopped. Checking through the wiki, MP mentioned it was best used for holes. But I'll revert the change since boundary makes more sense.
|
|
| 113255342 | Careful with copy and pasting opening hours, they are not always in the right format. I've fixed this for you. |
|
| 113255191 | Thanks, for the edit. This building is just one within the Bexhill Hospital grounds known as the Health Centre. I hope you don't mind me reverting your edit and using the information you've added to the correct way. Alex |
|
| 112774736 | Hello! Newer Bing Aerial Imagery has a terrible offset round Bexhill, it's better to use osmuk cadastral parcels here. Hope you don't mind me reverting the change.
|
|
| 110642200 | Okay, wrong changeset, but it applies in general |
|
| 110642200 | Please be careful with the geometry, bing isn't well aligned, better to use osmuk cadastral parcels |