This is kind of a large area to edit in one go, especially with little to go on in the change comment.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132546022

Updated number to fit the E.123 format.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132593128

I appreciate the sense of humor, but a little bit more descriptiveness in the comments would be more helpful.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132562285

Naming sidewalks the same as the street they parallel helps.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132275674

I'm curious if the gold/red information on the tee numbers is relevant.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132132348

You may find it easier to do these kinds of edits in JOSM where you can easily tap the W key and then move along the line, clicking to instantly jump the nearest point to the crosshair position, saving 2-4 clicks per node compared to id.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132078732

Is this a signposted autotrail?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131996101

Overall good but missing street names on sidewalks
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131941280

Is there a gate on this path now going north? Or is it supposed to be on the road going west?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131743500

Looks like it...but you're also not the only one to get a little confused by this (and would actually be the way to mark the boundary of an apartment complex, which would render on the map).

Take a look at Kendall-Whittier or the Blue Dome District for how to map neighborhoods; these also do render on the map at the boundary.

Different data consumers render things differently. landuse=residential is for the actual landuse, which in these cases, crosses other land uses like landuse=highway not reflected in these polygons.

Nice edit, but the changeset comment could use a little work to at least give a ballpark idea of what's going on.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131510629

might have meant place=neighborhood?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131630495

Can we get some descriptive information in your changeset comments instead of swearing?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131502170

Is this a new dedicated cycleway or is it an on-street lane?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130706053

You might consider drawing the two halves seperately, and draw another outline around the neighborhood filling the donut hole. Then combine the three areas as a multipolygon. I think that's the c key (it's the same as to combine two lines end to end). That should create a multipolygon for the golf course that excludes the street and the neighborhood, reflecting the landuse of the golf course area itself. Adding highway=path to lines added for the paths can visually represent that connection.

Did you intent to make this one polygon including an entire neighborhood and part of the street separating the two halves?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130042874

Should be separated with ; instead of /
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129922983

I'm not sure the change you made was the one you expected to make. What was the goal here?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129922949

Maybe for continuity but not for conflation! At some point someone's gonna have to get some proper legal descriptions for a lot of the boundaries around metro Tulsa and conflate them properly. Biggest hassle is working out where the line is on the property edges along the street and where the line falls along the center of a road, since it varies, a lot, and with not much consistency.