OpenStreetMap
Baloo Uriza's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 109629065 | It'll be in the tags after the fields section in the id editor that comes up by default if you're on the website. |
|
| 109629065 | Be sure to update source:maxspeed if changing maxspeed.
|
|
| 109351633 | Awesome. Just making sure because we don't have great imagery for the area and there's different tagging for roads that don't have marked lanes. |
|
| 109548272 | The US in general suffers from upward classification creep in general, but Texas definitely has a pretty severe case of it. Good rule of thumb is if there's multiple possible classifications, the safest bet is the lowest sensible option. Most people and routers don't really care about nitpicking at the low end, but on long distances, how the high end gets classified matters quite a bit for more rapid elimination of lower quality routes. |
|
| 109548272 | US would be primary, the main state highways would be secondary and secondary state highways tertiary. |
|
| 109367977 | Glad to see that place is still doing OK after Oklacon ended; seemed like a lot of stuff was dependent on the convention happening every year to put them in the black for the year.
|
|
| 109351633 | Is this marked as two lanes, or is it unmarked?
|
|
| 109544106 | This one's good-ish. Adjusting corners to line up would be ideal when using RapID to pull in building outlines, since it's often a little off.
|
|
| 109548272 | Spur 30 is one of the Texas secondary highways, which is third level. It's not a particularly well travelled route, so I don't really think upgrading it was particularly warranted. In general if there's two highway=* values that could apply, the lower of the two is probably the better option.
|
|
| 109108889 | Nice catch, looks like the old rule cited (and looks like bicycle:source can now be removed) was repealed on August 9, 2019 and now points to a newly renumbered code preventing lane splitting.
|
|
| 109486760 | Assuming this is a detached single family home, then building=detached would be the most specific tag.
|
|
| 109489043 | Seems like you upgraded several obviously primary sections to trunk...could you please not do that? Trunk is for expressways, primary for major undivided unlimited roads.
|
|
| 109521028 | Curious how this ended up being a globe-spanning edit.
|
|
| 109523788 | Please don't abbreviate in names. Computers are real good at creating abbreviations on the fly when desirable but are bad at expanding them because of the potential for ambiguity. osm.wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29
|
|
| 109441258 | This does appear to actually be a rural farmhouse driveway.
|
|
| 109219049 | Did this recently get lane markings? If not, then lane_markings=no is better than lanes=2 in this case.
|
|
| 109205754 | OK. Probably actually a cycleway if it has lanes. |
|
| 109161511 | This is clearly a bad edit. I 40 is not the name of this road, it's the ref, and it was already tagged. The name is signed regularly along this section and the source:name=* tag clearly indicates when it was renamed. See also osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only Also was this surveyed as having actually been changed on these segments for the speed limit?
|
|
| 109205754 | Is this a path, or is it the sidewalk to Sand Springs Park Road?
|
|
| 108774289 | A school parking lot and driveway is "residential" now?
|