This way might need to be split.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101213979

Could I get your source on this? The Mapbox imagery seems to suggest this is a farm's driveway.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101241737

Not entirely sure what you're trying to convey here. Could you clarify?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101262786

Not sure how that driveway doesn't meet the road at a right angle.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101317416

Also you might want to take another look at that? At least in the Bing, Esri and Mapbox imagery it looks like this location is a Conoco gas station forecourt, not a building where one would find a Mexican restaurant.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101409139

Not bad, but addr:street should be "Northwest 23rd Street". Abbreviations are not used in street names.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101409139

Looks like you removed "natural=water" without replacing it with anything.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101458544

Would be better to map the loop as a loop instead of tagging a node.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101468287

Heh, probably an oil lease road given it's going to an oil battery.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101436430

I'm thinking this changeset can likely be safely reverted?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101462321

These really do look like household driveways.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101487480

Looks like a house at the end of that, the original tags seem to apply.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101492068

Additionally if the idea was to tag operator=*, then name and Midland Valley is also wrong. Not sure what, if any, that branch has, and the operator is definitely Tulsa Sapulpa Union Railroad

The railroad hasn't existed in a long time. There also is no passenger rail service there, which is what route=railway is for.

No problem. Sorry to suck you into this rabbit hole. I'm hoping things move in a more consistent direction in general vis-a-vis reserved lanes in general. I don't understand the resistance to this generally given that how Fairview got retagged including the bicycle lanes is consistent with other kinds of lane tagging, such as that for HOVs and buses, complete with access tags.

I do understand the need to understand the width, I just don't have a good method for measuring that given travel and "standing in traffic" implications. I would have added lanes:width=* if I knew the values, though they are at least wide enough to fit a car down as can be seen in the Bing imagery at various points.

In the case of shared lane, that's clearly visible where the lane line changes to a broken line. In California, this indicates that the lane is shared with other traffic for that length.

There's four lanes. The bicycle lane counts as a lane. The whole idea that a lane doesn't count just because of modal access is both preposterous and doesn't agree with other types of reserved lane tagging, does it? The wiki seems extremely wrong here. just logically working it out, especially a lane that even motorists are required to merge into in California in order to turn right.

I feel like a reclassification blanket up to primary for what is mostly a two lane state highway is a little ambitious. Typically that's done at a secondary level and more built up parts are classed higher.

The wiki is pretty unreliable anymore, a lot of wiki types like to be prescriptionist rather than descriptionist and that kind of pikes over everything.

I'm not going to go archive diving right now, I have work to do. You're welcome to do so. Or change the tag back. I'm honestly not that invested in this spur.

You might consider the usage tag instead of the service one mostly because that seems to be the direction things are going and validators are encouraging that, in order to leave service=* open for it's original highway=service usage.

Sure, usage=industrial works for me.

I believe this was discussed on the OSM tagging and the OpenRailwayMap mailing lists back in the late '10s.