leisure=playground is the correct tag for a playground.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71544653

Please use "Drive" instead of "Dr" in name fields.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71363479

+1-580-772-8808 is the format used for phone numbers in OSM.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71260534

I don't understand why the type was removed here.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71239254

Hi! Could you break up the Norman LCN relation into individual routes, please? This will improve maintainability as it'll actually be possible to validate, and is more consistent with the idea that relations are not categories, and that route relations contain one individual route.

Is it no longer 5th Street and Bank R??
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/72671314

Wow, I hate to poop on this one since you did add a lot of detail, but you mashed together a lot of segments that were lane-tagged pretty specifically.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/72671752

Sad thing is, those were originally built to be Sapulpa reservoirs before that oil well blew out and contaminated them...
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/72698917

I think your previous alignment was better, the Maxar imagery isn't properly or consistently aligned like the Premium imagery is.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/72701357

Nice attention to detail on this one.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/72550469

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/72621743 where the changeset comment is: Removing SEO spam.

Please be sure to update source:maxspeed as appropriate.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/72397374

OK, on closer look, this wasn't quite as weird as I initially thought from memory. Check changeset/72326576, I think that makes a pretty good compromise.

After it's updated through down to Colbert, I'd definitely agree that it's a motorway, but based on going through it myself, I think motorway is going to set people up for a slightly optimistic assumption as to what to expect.

Are there actually any lanes or is it your typical unmarked residential street? If it's the latter, lanes=2 is inaccurate, leaving the tag off entirely is better in that case.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/72300277

This changeset is being discussed on changeset/72284614
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/72284867

In either case, trunks and motorways are both forms of controlled access roads. Trunks may have a mix of ramps and at-grade intersections, motorways don't. There's not really a differentiation for this section from the rest of the expressway except it briefly has ramps. calling this a motorway is a bit of a stretch as such.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/72284614

This really fits trunk way more strongly than it does motorway, given it's connection to single carriageway and terminus with a surface junction.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/72284446

Yeah, gonna have to dispute this. This is a trunk, it alternates between grade seperated ramps and surface intersections from Colbert to Tushka
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/72284614

Yeah, that looks better. I made the ramps to/from the northeast side of the junction agree, but I think that basically gets it. I tend to feel that trunks start at the most recent highway junction but the first grade separated junction that isn't in a mix of at-grade and grade separated junctions is a plenty fair compromise